After winning the Democratic primary on August 18, Dandiya became her party’s nominee for Florida’s newly redrawn 22nd Congressional District. She faces Republican nominee Casey Askar in the November 3 general election. Recent polling and the Cook Political Report’s decision to move the race from “Lean Republican” to “Toss Up” have brought growing attention to this open-seat contest.

Her candidacy also adds to the story of Indian-American participation in public life. For families who have watched their children grow up in Florida, pursue an education, and move into positions of responsibility, her journey has a familiar beginning. It now places her before voters across a district that brings together communities with different backgrounds and needs.

A Family’s Journey from Jaipur to Jupiter

Dandiya’s parents moved from Jaipur to Jupiter, Florida, in the 1980s, seeking greater opportunity. Their daughter grew up in Palm Beach County, where education, hard work, and service were part of everyday family life.

Her father, Dr. Rohit Dandiya, has been in medical practice for more than 20 years. Her mother began a new chapter of her own at age 40, founding a Montessori school in Jupiter. 

Pia now lives in Palm Beach Gardens with her husband, Navneet Alag, and their son, Sahib. Sahib attends the same school his grandmother founded. For the family, the school provides a connection between the life Pia’s parents built after arriving from India and the childhood she and her husband are creating for their son.

Living only miles from where she grew up gives Dandiya a personal connection to the area she hopes to represent. Her campaign emphasizes that connection, presenting her as someone whose understanding of local families comes from growing up in the community and raising a child there today.

Her parents’ experiences also help explain the importance she places on opportunity. A medical practice and a school require years of work and a continuing commitment to the people they serve. Within that family setting, Pia saw how professional effort and education could contribute to a community while helping a family establish a secure future.

From Teaching to Founding a High School

Dandiya holds a bachelor’s degree in government from Harvard University and a master’s degree in education from Boston University. She began her professional career teaching in low-income schools, where more than 90 percent of her students reached proficiency on state examinations.

Those early classroom experiences placed her close to the challenges facing children whose families had limited financial resources. They also gave her an opportunity to see how strong instruction and consistent support could affect student achievement.

At age 28, Dandiya founded a high school in Harlem and became one of the youngest high school principals in the country. Her goal was to improve the prospects of students growing up in poverty by helping them prepare for college and the opportunities that could follow.

The school’s results became a defining part of her professional record. Every graduate earned admission to college, even though 86 percent of its students lived below the poverty line. For families facing economic hardship, college admission represented a significant step toward a wider range of future choices.

Her experience as a teacher and principal continues to shape how she discusses education. In her campaign, she emphasizes the close connection between schools and a family’s ability to build a stable life. Her work in Harlem gave her direct responsibility for helping students move from that idea to a concrete achievement: graduating from high school with a college acceptance in hand.

Experience in Washington and the Private Sector

Dandiya was later selected as a White House Fellow, serving at the White House Domestic Policy Council and the U.S. Department of Education. These assignments expanded her experience from individual classrooms and school leadership to the development and implementation of public policy.

Working in Washington allowed her to examine how federal decisions affect families, schools, and communities across the country. It also placed her in government institutions responsible for addressing issues she had encountered firsthand as an educator.

She subsequently led public sector initiatives at Apple, working with state leaders on efforts involving education, health care, and government systems. That role added private sector experience to a career already grounded in teaching and public service.

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker also appointed her to the Illinois P-20 Council, where she co-chaired its K-12 Computer Science working group. Her involvement brought another dimension to her education work, connecting school policy with the skills students may need as technology changes the workplace.

Together, these positions form the professional background she brings to her first congressional campaign. Voters can assess that record alongside her proposals and consider how her experience might translate into service in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Her Priorities for Florida Families

Dandiya’s campaign centers on strengthening public education, expanding economic opportunity, and protecting families’ freedom to make decisions about their lives and futures. She connects those goals to the pressures households face as they try to pay their bills, raise children, and plan ahead.

She has emphasized household costs and economic security, arguing that families need access to good schools and jobs as well as affordable health care and dependable child care. Her approach reflects a belief that economic independence becomes more attainable when the services families rely on are within reach.

In Congress, Dandiya says she would work to expand early childhood education and job training. She also proposes making health care and child care more affordable, recognizing the effect these expenses can have on parents’ ability to work and maintain a stable household.

For older residents, she has pledged to defend Social Security and Medicare. She has also expressed support for veterans and emphasized access to government programs that help eligible residents.

Her campaign includes a commitment to protecting democratic values and ensuring that people have a voice in decisions affecting their communities. She presents these priorities as part of an effort to help Floridians build secure and fulfilling lives.

For voters, the next step is to examine the details of those proposals, consider how they would be carried out, and compare her approach with that of her opponent. Her background provides a record to evaluate; her campaign commitments indicate what she hopes to pursue if elected.

A New District with a Broad Range of Communities

Florida’s 22nd Congressional District has changed significantly through the state’s mid-decade congressional redistricting. Its new boundaries include portions of Palm Beach, Broward, Hendry, and Collier counties, combining urban neighborhoods, suburban communities, and rural areas.

The Cook Political Report describes the newly drawn district as stretching from Palm Beach County toward Florida’s Gulf Coast. Its geographic reach means the eventual representative will serve communities whose daily concerns and local economies can differ considerably.

The new configuration is substantially different from the district’s previous boundaries, making comparisons with older election results less direct. With no incumbent running for the seat under the new boundaries, both nominees are working to introduce themselves and their priorities across the district.

Dandiya had previously campaigned for a different congressional district before entering the race in the newly configured 22nd District. She and her supporters describe the redistricting that created this open-seat contest as Republican mid-decade gerrymandering.

Askar secured the Republican nomination and brings his background as a Marine veteran and businessman to the race. The two candidates are now campaigning across the district as voters consider who should represent them in Washington.

What the Polling Shows

Recent surveys indicate a competitive election, but it’s important to consider the methodology and commissioning of each poll when interpreting the results.

A House Majority PAC poll conducted by Impact Research from August 24 through August 31 found Dandiya leading Askar by 46 percent to 44 percent among likely voters in the initial head-to-head matchup.

After respondents received information about both candidates, Dandiya’s support increased to 49 percent, while Askar remained at 44 percent. These were separate stages of the same survey, an important distinction when discussing the reported five-point lead.

The poll also found the generic congressional ballot tied, with 46 percent supporting a Democratic candidate and 46 percent supporting a Republican candidate. That result provides additional context for the closely divided electorate reflected in the candidate matchup.

When assessing the findings, consider the sponsorship of House Majority PAC, a Democratic-aligned political action committee.

A separate public survey by Tavern Research, conducted from August 10 through August 12 among 551 likely voters, showed Dandiya and Askar tied at 50 percent each.

Taken together, the available surveys point to a closely contested race. They show either a tie or a relatively small difference between the candidates, with Dandiya’s larger advantage appearing after respondents received additional candidate information in the Impact Research poll.

A Race Drawing Wider Attention

On September 25, the Cook Political Report changed its rating for Florida’s 22nd District from “Lean Republican” to “Toss Up.” The change placed the contest among the closely watched House races of the 2026 election cycle.

Cook’s race summary identifies Dandiya as an education policy expert and the Democratic nominee and Askar as a Marine veteran who won the Republican primary. Its revised rating, alongside the polling, has increased interest in how the election will develop during the remaining weeks of the campaign.

For South Florida’s Indian-American community, Dandiya’s candidacy carries an additional connection. Her family’s journey from Jaipur to Jupiter, her mother’s school, and her son’s enrollment there give a personal dimension to a campaign being followed for its national political significance.

Desh-Videsh Media Group and its affiliate company Global Indian News Network are proud to support Pia Dandiya in this race and the effort to take back the U.S. House.

That support accompanies the responsibility voters have to examine candidates’ qualifications, proposals, and records.

On November 3, residents of the newly redrawn district will decide whether Dandiya or Askar represents them in Congress. For Pia Dandiya, the election is an opportunity to bring her experience in education, government, and the private sector to the communities surrounding the place where her family’s American story began.

For many Indian American families, life in America has centered on everyday responsibilities: finding work, educating children, starting businesses, and becoming part of a neighborhood. Politics often enters the conversation when a government decision reaches the household. A change in healthcare policy affects a parent’s treatment. A school board decision affects a child’s classroom. An immigration rule creates uncertainty for a colleague or relative.

In 2026, questions about belonging have become harder to overlook. Public hostility toward people of Indian and other South Asian backgrounds is receiving increased attention. Online abuse and racial stereotypes have brought uncomfortable conversations into homes where families once felt removed from arguments about who belongs in America.

The November midterms arrive against this background. Readers need accurate information about the hostility being reported and the candidates seeking office. They also deserve clear explanations of what those offices can accomplish.

Every eligible citizen is obligated to approach these elections with seriousness. Verify your registration. Examine the candidates. Make a plan to vote. Government decisions affect our lives long after campaign advertisements disappear.

What Recent Research Shows

Reports released this September document troubling patterns. The Center for the Study of Organized Hate examined online hostility toward South Asian Americans across several platforms. Its research describes racial insults and narratives portraying South Asians as demographic threats. The report covers people of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and other South Asian backgrounds.

A separate brief from Stop AAPI Hate found that anti-South Asian slurs increased by 109 percent between January 2023 and December 2025 in the online spaces it monitored. That figure measures activity in those spaces. It does not measure the views of the entire American population or the national incidence of hate crimes.

Those distinctions matter. A disturbing social media post may reach thousands of people, but its circulation alone cannot establish how widely its views are shared. Research about South Asians includes Indian Americans while also covering communities with different backgrounds and experiences.

Careful reporting should explain these limits while giving the documented hostility the attention it deserves. Racial insults have consequences for the people who encounter them, even when researchers cannot measure every effect.

Questions about immigration policy, visa programs, and employment deserve factual examination. People can disagree about those policies and ask the government to explain its decisions. Racial stereotypes distort the discussion by placing suspicion on individuals because of their ancestry, regardless of their actual circumstances.

The DHS “Mr. Singh” Post Deserves Scrutiny

A recent Department of Homeland Security post shows why the language used by public agencies deserves close examination.

On September 9, 2026, DHS shared a Transformers-style image that included the words, “Get off our roads; you don’t know how to drive, Mr. Singh.” It also carried the warning, “Self-deport or find out.” The wording differed from “Mr. Singh, go home,” although the post’s message prompted concerns about exclusion and racial stereotyping.

Sikh and Hindu advocacy groups criticized the post. Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi also condemned it publicly. Subsequently, Krishnamoorthi, Shri Thanedar, Suhas Subramanyam, Pramila Jayapal, and Ami Bera criticized the now-deleted post for using Sikh identity to portray a dangerous, unwanted foreigner.

A federal agency has a responsibility to enforce the law and explain its actions accurately. Its public communications carry the authority of the government. When those communications use threatening language linked to a name from a recognizable community, it raises valid questions about the agency’s judgment.

A surname cannot establish someone’s immigration status or driving ability. Allegations against an individual require evidence and consideration under the applicable law. Government messaging should exercise the same care.

Indian Americans and other South Asian Americans have differing citizenship and immigration statuses. Many are U.S. citizens. Others live here lawfully under different arrangements. Their circumstances cannot be read from a name or appearance.

Criticism of the DHS post deserves a substantive response. Public agencies should explain how they will communicate about enforcement without encouraging suspicion toward people who share a surname, faith, or appearance with someone featured in a campaign.

What Is at Stake in November?

The general election takes place on November 3, 2026. All 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are up for election. Candidates are contesting all 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, along with Senate races and numerous state and local elections.

The offices on a ballot have different powers. Congress shapes federal legislation and spending. State governments oversee major areas of education and public administration. Local officials make decisions involving services, development, and community facilities.

These responsibilities affect ordinary households. They also help voters assess campaign promises. When a candidate proposes a change, ask whether the office has the authority to carry it out. How would the proposal be funded? Whose cooperation would be required?

A forceful speech can leave those questions unanswered.

Readers following several races should also examine whether candidates have addressed the concerns of their constituencies. National visibility does not establish how someone would perform the work of a particular office. Local interviews and public meetings can reveal whether a candidate understands the people seeking representation.

Register, Vote, and Expect Answers

Every eligible citizen should treat voting as a responsibility that requires preparation. Waiting until the last moment can create avoidable problems with registration, an outdated address, or uncertainty about where and how to vote.

Check your registration now. Confirm that your information is current. Learn your state’s deadlines and voting options, then make a plan you can follow. Vote.gov connects residents with official resources for registration, checking their status, early voting, and mail-in or absentee voting.

Anyone who can vote and faces no obstacle to participating should ask a direct question before sitting out: why am I leaving this decision to other people?

Complaining about elected officials while repeatedly choosing to avoid elections deserves scrutiny. Everyone retains the right to criticize the government and challenge discrimination, whether they vote or not. At the same time, eligible citizens who demand accountability from officials should be prepared to exercise their responsibility when an election arrives.

Anger expressed in a family conversation or on social media does not cast a ballot.

Some citizens face genuine barriers to participation. They deserve reliable information and practical assistance with the voting arrangements available to them. For those who can participate, the next step is straightforward: study the choices and vote.

Candidates should earn support through their records and proposals. Ask how candidates respond to racial stereotyping, what they plan to do about your concerns, and whether their promises align with the powers of the office. A familiar name should never replace that examination.

Participation Beyond the Ballot

Voting, campaign volunteering, and political contributions involve different requirements. Those differences are particularly relevant in immigrant households where family members may have different citizenship or residency statuses.

Voting eligibility and registration are governed by applicable state and federal rules. Registration deadlines and early voting arrangements vary by state. Residents should consult official election resources for requirements that apply to them.

Campaign volunteers may assist with events or administrative work. Election workers perform a separate function, helping election officials administer the voting process. Attending public meetings provides another way to learn about government decisions without joining a campaign.

Political donations carry additional legal requirements. Under federal election rules, U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents may contribute, subject to applicable restrictions. Foreign nationals cannot make election contributions. Certain uncompensated volunteer activities are permitted, but foreign nationals cannot participate in election-related decision-making.

Indian ancestry does not establish voting eligibility. Eligibility to contribute does not necessarily establish eligibility to vote. Each person needs to understand the rules governing their status and the activity they are considering.

Indian American Candidates to Watch

Several Indian Americans are competing in prominent November races.

Bera, Khanna, Jayapal, and Subramanyam are incumbent representatives seeking reelection. Shah won Arizona’s Democratic primary and faces Republican Jay Feely. Dandiya secured her Democratic nomination in Florida, while Ramaswamy is Ohio’s Republican gubernatorial nominee against Democrat Amy Acton.

At the state level, Indian American Impact’s 2026 roster includes Arvind Venkat in Pennsylvania, Darshana Patel in California, Ranjeev Puri in Michigan, and Priya Sundareshan in Arizona. Nabeela Syed appears on the November candidate list for the Illinois Senate.

The roster covers the election cycle and should not be treated as proof that every listed candidate advanced through a primary. Readers following a particular contest should distinguish an election-cycle listing from a confirmed place on the November ballot.

Some well-known campaigns have ended. Raja Krishnamoorthi lost the Democratic Senate primary in Illinois. Shri Thanedar lost his congressional primary in Michigan. Saikat Chakrabarti and Jasmeet Bains did not advance to November in California.

Those outcomes belong in the coverage, too. Familiarity from an earlier campaign does not mean a candidate remains in the race.

Pia Dandiya’s Race Becomes More Competitive

For South Florida readers, Pia Dandiya’s campaign is particularly relevant. The Indian American educator won the Democratic primary for Florida’s 22nd Congressional District and faces Republican Casey Askar.

On September 25, Cook Political Report changed its assessment from “Lean Republican” to “Toss Up.” Its race summary describes a close contest. The shift indicates increased competitiveness; it does not establish that Dandiya is ahead or predict a certain outcome.

The newly drawn district covers parts of Palm Beach, Broward, Hendry, and Collier counties. It includes Wellington and Parkland and extends west toward Marco Island, bringing together communities with differing priorities.

Both candidates are seeking to represent that constituency. Coverage should examine their proposals and records, including their responses to questions from residents across the district.

A changing race rating is a significant news development. Voters need to know what candidates plan to do in office and how they will address their concerns.

Reporting With Care

Indian Americans bring differing political opinions and experiences to public life. Community journalism serves readers best when it reflects those differences, verifies claims, and clearly separates reporting from endorsement.

The concerns surrounding hostility deserve sustained attention. So do the decisions that shape schools, businesses, and family budgets. Readers should receive enough information to assess both without an assumption that shared ancestry produces a single political viewpoint.

Public officials and candidates should anticipate a thorough examination of their words. When a government agency publishes imagery that draws accusations of racial stereotyping, the response belongs in the coverage. When candidates make promises, their authority to deliver them belongs there as well.

That scrutiny should continue after the votes are counted.

Closing Thought

Every eligible citizen reading this should check their registration and make a plan to vote. If you expect elected officials to answer for their decisions, take the time to examine who is asking for your support. Raise your questions before the election and follow what the winners do afterward. Everyone retains the right to speak against discrimination and criticize the government. Those who can cast a ballot also have a concrete opportunity to help choose the people exercising public authority, and they should take that opportunity seriously.

About the Author:

A software engineer by profession, Indian culture enthusiast, ardent promoter of  Hinduism, and a cancer survivor, Raj Shah is a managing editor of Desh-Videsh Magazine and co-founder of Desh Videsh Media Group. Promoting the rich culture and heritage of India and Hinduism has been his motto ever since he arrived in the US in 1969.
He has been instrumental in starting and promoting several community organizations such as the Indian Religious and Cultural Center and International Hindu University. Raj has written two books on Hinduism titled Chronology of Hinduism and Understanding Hinduism. He has also written several children books focusing on Hindu culture and religion.

In the summer of 2026, two flags rise beneath the same sky.

On July 4, the United States celebrated the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Six weeks later, on August 15, India will observe its 80th Independence Day. One nation looks back on two and a half centuries of an extraordinary democratic experiment. The other celebrates eight decades since the end of British rule and the birth of a sovereign nation.

For Indian Americans, these are not two unrelated anniversaries marked on different pages of the calendar. They are chapters of one deeply personal story.

We sing “Jana Gana Mana” with affection for the land that gave us our roots and “The Star-Spangled Banner” with gratitude for the country that gave us room to grow. “We celebrate India not because we have failed to become Americans. We celebrate America not because we have forgotten India.”  We carry love for both because each has shaped a different part of who we are.

India is our mātrubhūmi—the motherland that gave us our traditions, languages, values, and spiritual inheritance. America is our karmabhūmi—the land of action where so many of us studied, worked, raised families, built businesses, and pursued opportunities that once seemed beyond reach.

Between these two homelands stands a community that has spent generations learning not merely how to live in two worlds but how to connect them.

Two Journeys Toward Freedom

The American and Indian struggles for independence were separated by nearly two centuries, yet both arose from a shared conviction: people should not be governed without a voice in their future.

On July 4, 1776, representatives of thirteen colonies adopted the Declaration of Independence. Its assertion that all people are created equal and possess certain unalienable rights became one of history’s most influential political declarations.

The new nation, however, did not immediately live up to those words. Slavery continued. Native peoples were displaced and dispossessed. Women were denied political equality. Generations of Black Americans had to struggle for freedoms that had been promised but withheld. Immigrants encountered prejudice, exclusion, and suspicion.

American democracy did not arrive completely in 1776. It became—and remains—a continuing debate over who is included in the word “all.”

That unfinished journey does not diminish the American ideal. It reminds us that freedom must be protected, widened, and renewed by every generation.

India’s path was different, but its moral foundation was equally powerful. On August 15, 1947, after a long and painful struggle against colonial rule, India awakened to independence.

Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of satyāgraha showed the world that disciplined nonviolence could challenge an empire. Countless freedom fighters—famous and unnamed, men and women, students, farmers, laborers, poets, reformers, and spiritual leaders—sacrificed their comfort, security, and sometimes their lives for a nation many of them would never live to see.

Yet India’s freedom arrived amid the trauma of Partition. Independence brought celebration and sorrow together. Millions were uprooted. Families were divided. Communal violence claimed innumerable lives. The midnight of freedom carried both hope and grief.

India then faced the enormous task of building democratic institutions across a vast land of different religions, languages, castes, regions, and customs. Poverty was widespread. Literacy was limited. Infrastructure was inadequate. Many outside observers doubted that such a diverse country could remain united and democratic.

India did more than survive those doubts. It built and sustained the world’s largest democracy.

Neither the United States nor India has followed a perfect path. Both nations have faced injustice, division, political turmoil, and moments that tested their highest ideals. Yet both continue to return to one central belief: the authority of government ultimately comes from the people.

That belief is the bridge between July 4 and August 15.

What America Made Possible

For the earliest Indian immigrants, America was not always welcoming.

Immigration laws once restricted Asian migration and citizenship. Indian laborers on the West Coast faced discrimination and violence. Bhagat Singh Thind, a U.S. Army veteran who served during World War I, fought unsuccessfully for the right to retain American citizenship. In 1923, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Indians were not eligible for naturalization under the racial classifications then embedded in American law.

That history forms part of the Indian-American experience, even if we rarely discuss it during our community celebrations.

The Luce-Celler Act of 1946 allowed a small annual quota of immigrants from India to enter the United States and made Indian immigrants eligible for naturalization. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 significantly expanded immigration opportunities by replacing nationality-based quotas with a system that prioritizes family reunification and professional skills.

A new chapter began.

Doctors came to serve communities that desperately needed them. Engineers joined American industries during a period of rapid technological growth. Professors, scientists, and researchers entered universities and laboratories. Small-business owners opened motels, grocery stores, restaurants, and convenience stores, often working seven days a week with limited capital and little social support.

Many arrived with one or two suitcases, a few dollars, and the telephone number of a relative or friend.

There were no WhatsApp calls home, no Indian television channels in every household, and no convenient direct flights connecting American cities with Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, or Bengaluru. Letters could take weeks. An international telephone call was expensive and reserved for important news. Finding familiar spices could require a long drive. Temples and cultural centers were few.

Two historical documents side-by-side: a 1776 edition of “The Pennsylvania Evening Post” containing the U.S. Declaration of Independence and India’s 1930 Declaration of Independence.

Those immigrants had to build a community from the ground up.

They organized associations in living rooms and rented halls. They established temples in former churches, warehouses, and modest suburban buildings. They opened language schools so their children could learn Gujarati, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Bengali, Punjabi, Malayalam, Marathi, and other mother tongues. They celebrated Diwali in school cafeterias and India’s Independence Day in public parks.

They also founded newspapers, magazines, and community media because mainstream publications often overlooked their achievements and concerns.

“The first generation was not merely seeking financial security. It was creating a cultural home.”

America made that home possible. Its universities welcomed talent. Its economy rewarded initiative. Its Constitution protected freedom of religion, speech, and association. Its entrepreneurial culture allowed newcomers to begin with little and build something meaningful.

Bhagat Singh Thind, a U.S. Army veteran who served during World War I, fought unsuccessfully for the right to retain American citizenship.

Indian Americans did not succeed alone; no community does. We benefited from the civil rights struggles that came before us, particularly the sacrifices of Black Americans who challenged discriminatory laws and expanded the meaning of equal citizenship. The doors through which later immigrants walked were opened, in part, by people who marched, organized, suffered, and refused to accept exclusion as permanent.

Remembering that history should deepen both our gratitude and our responsibility to stand with others when their rights or dignity are threatened.

What India Gave Us

If America provided opportunity, India provided an inner compass.

Indian immigrants brought more than professional degrees: family photographs and recipes passed down through generations. They carried a civilizational inheritance: dharma, seva, respect for elders, devotion to family, reverence for knowledge, and the belief that success has meaning only when it serves something larger than oneself.

They brought the wisdom of the Vedas, Upaniṣads, Bhagavad Gītā, Rāmāyaṇa, and other sacred traditions. They brought Jain ahimsa, Sikh seva, Buddhist compassion, and the many devotional streams that have enriched Indian civilization. They brought music, dance, literature, philosophy, festivals, and regional customs shaped over thousands of years.

Not every Indian-American family practices these traditions in the same way. Some are deeply religious; others are cultural or secular. Some speak an Indian language fluently; others know only a few words. Some visit India every year; others know it mainly through stories told by parents and grandparents.

Still, certain values endure.

We see them when children touch the feet of their grandparents. We see them when families prepare meals for a neighbor facing illness. We see them in temple volunteers who serve without expecting recognition, physicians who offer free health screenings, students who tutor younger children, and business owners who quietly support community causes.

We also see them in the importance placed on education. For many immigrant parents, education was not simply a route to a good salary. It was a form of security that could not be confiscated at a border. Degrees, knowledge, and discipline were possessions no government could easily take away.

The results are visible throughout the United States. Indian Americans now serve as physicians, educators, engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs, attorneys, artists, journalists, public officials, and members of the armed forces. They lead corporations, universities, and nonprofit organizations. They conduct lifesaving research, create jobs, develop new technologies, and care for patients in large cities and small towns.

Yet numbers, titles, and salaries alone cannot measure the community’s contribution. Its real story is also found in everyday acts of service: the rural doctor answering a late-night call, the teacher encouraging a struggling student, the motel owner offering a newcomer a first job, or the young volunteer packing meals for families she may never meet.

These are not exclusively Indian values or American values. They are human values strengthened by both traditions.

“250 @ 250”: Recovering a History Too Often Overlooked

As the United States commemorates its 250th anniversary, Indiaspora—a nonprofit network of global Indian leaders—has launched an important initiative titled “250 @ 250: The Indian American Story.”

The project presents a curated collection of 250 moments illustrating the depth, diversity, and influence of Indians and Indian Americans in the United States. Together, these moments remind us that the Indian-American story did not begin with the highly skilled immigration wave that followed the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. Its roots extend much further into American history.

One of the earliest moments highlighted by Indiaspora dates to 1790, when an unnamed “man from Madras” arrived in Salem, Massachusetts. Documented by Reverend William Bentley, he became the first recorded direct, non-coerced commercial and cultural visitor from India to New England. His presence was connected to the growing maritime trade between New England and the Indian subcontinent.

Another little-known story is that of Conjee Rustomjee Couhujee Bey, who served in the U.S. Navy under the name Antonio Gomez during the Civil War. His service places a person of Indian origin in an American military uniform decades before large-scale Indian immigration began.

Three generations of Sikh-Americn medical professionals in a modern clinic.

The collection also remembers the Bengali peddlers, silk traders, and laborers who built lives in neighborhoods such as Harlem and the Lower East Side. Living within a racially divided America, some formed families with African American and Latina women, creating communities that crossed ethnic and cultural boundaries long before the term “Indian American” became familiar.

In 1886, Anandi Gopal Joshi graduated from the Woman’s Medical College of Pennsylvania, becoming the first Indian woman to earn a Western medical degree in the United States. She was only 21. Her accomplishment anticipated the profound role that Indian and Indian-American women would later play in American medicine.

The project also highlights Swami Vivekananda’s historic appearance at the 1893 World’s Parliament of Religions in Chicago. His message of religious tolerance and universal acceptance introduced Hindu philosophy to a large American audience and helped establish a lasting place for Vedanta and Hindu thought in this country.

Other moments document the contributions of early farmers and entrepreneurs; the establishment of Hindu temples, Sikh gurdwaras, and other houses of worship; the growth of Indian-American physicians’ organizations; the spread of Indian cuisine; the influence of artists and musicians; and the rise of Indian-origin leaders in corporate America.

Indiaspora’s collection performs an important service: it replaces a narrow success story with a fuller human history.

The Indian-American journey was not simply a straight line from immigrant student to doctor, engineer, or chief executive. It included sailors, soldiers, farmers, peddlers, cooks, religious teachers, writers, activists, and families whose names have largely disappeared from popular memory. It contained remarkable achievement but also discrimination, sacrifice, loneliness, and struggle.

By gathering these stories, Indiaspora has created more than a commemorative timeline. It has helped place Indian Americans where they belong—not outside the American story, looking in, but inside it, participating in the country’s development across generations.

Full credit and acknowledgment: The historical moments and project description in this section are drawn from “250 @ 250: The Indian American Story,” researched, curated, and presented by Indiaspora. Desh-Videsh gratefully acknowledges Indiaspora for preserving and sharing this important history.

From Guests to Stakeholders

For many years, Indian immigrants behaved as though they were guests in America.

They worked hard, paid taxes, avoided controversy, and told their children to concentrate on their education. Politics was considered divisive or unsafe. Public advocacy was left to someone else. Some believed professional achievement alone would guarantee acceptance.

The second and third generations have begun to change that approach.

Young Indian Americans increasingly understand that citizenship requires participation. They vote, organize, run for public office, serve on school boards, join the military, advocate for policy changes, and speak openly about discrimination. They do not see themselves as temporary visitors. America is their country, and they expect to have a voice in shaping its future.

A historical portrait of Dr. Anandi Gopal Joshi with her degree, 1886

That confidence is healthy, but it brings a demanding question: What kind of voice will we bring?

Will Indian Americans participate only when an issue affects visas, taxes, business interests, or relations with India? Or will we defend democratic principles consistently, including when another community is under attack?

The true test of political maturity is not whether we can gain access to powerful people. It is whether we use our influence responsibly.

At a time when public debate is becoming increasingly hostile, Indian Americans must resist the temptation to import every political division from India into American institutions. We may disagree strongly about governments, political parties, religious questions, and social policies. But disagreement should not turn temples, associations, professional organizations, and family gatherings into permanent battlegrounds.

Our community is too diverse to speak with one political voice—and it should not try.

Indian Americans are Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain, Buddhist, Jewish, Zoroastrian, and nonreligious. They trace their roots to every region of India and speak dozens of languages. They include recent immigrants, descendants of early settlers, professionals, laborers, entrepreneurs, students, and multiracial families.

That diversity is not a weakness to overcome. It is a democratic strength to preserve.

The Hyphen Is a Bridge

Swami Vivekananda addresses the World’s Parliament of Religions, 1893.

The term “Indian-American” is sometimes treated as though the hyphen represents divided loyalty. In truth, it represents connection.

“The hyphen does not ask us to choose between two countries. It tells the story of how one identity has enriched the other.”

An Indian-American child may eat pizza with friends on Friday, attend a pūjā on Saturday, volunteer at a food bank on Sunday, and begin Monday morning reciting the Pledge of Allegiance at school. She may enjoy Bollywood music and American football, speak English more comfortably than her parents’ language, and still feel a powerful connection to grandparents living thousands of miles away.

There is nothing confused about that identity. It is the natural experience of a multicultural America.

The first generation often worried that its children would become “too American.” The children sometimes felt they were not “Indian enough.” With time, many families discovered that identity is not a mathematical equation in which becoming more American requires becoming less Indian.

A young person can honor Diwali and Independence Day, appreciate the Bhagavad Gītā and the U.S. Constitution, celebrate Holi and Thanksgiving, and feel entirely at home in both worlds.

Indian-American life has already changed both cultures. Yoga and meditation have entered the American mainstream. Indian food is found far beyond major cities. Diwali is recognized by schools, legislatures, and public institutions. Indian music, fashion, cinema, and literature have become part of America’s cultural landscape.

Influence also travels in the other direction. Indian families have absorbed American ideas about individual choice, gender equality, open debate, and civic participation. Younger generations are raising difficult but necessary questions about caste, patriarchy, mental health, marriage, and personal freedom. Some of these conversations make elders uncomfortable, but they are also helping our traditions respond to a changing world.

“A living culture does not survive by freezing itself in the past. It survives by carrying its deepest values into the future.”

Freedom Is More Than a Flag

National anniversaries naturally invite celebration. There will be parades, patriotic songs, flag-hoisting ceremonies, fireworks, and speeches. These rituals matter. They give visible expression to our gratitude and belonging.

But freedom cannot be measured by the size of a flag or the volume of a slogan.

Freedom asks more of us.

It asks whether a child from a poor family receives a good education. It asks whether a woman can walk without fear and make decisions about her life. It asks whether religious minorities can worship without intimidation. It asks whether citizens can criticize their government without being treated as enemies. It asks whether immigrants are valued only for their labor or welcomed as full human beings.

Both India and America must continue facing these questions.

Patriotism should never require silence about a nation’s failures. Mature love of country is honest. We correct what we love because we want it to live up to its highest ideals.

Americans who confronted slavery, segregation, and discrimination were not betraying America. They were insisting that America honor its promise. Indians who challenge corruption, inequality, communal hatred, or injustice are not weakening India. They are asking the republic to remain faithful to the freedom for which earlier generations sacrificed.

For Indian Americans, that principle must apply equally to both nations. Love without honesty becomes sentimentality. Patriotism without accountability can become dangerous.

The Next Chapter Belongs to Our Children

From curry to burgers, every shared meal is another chapter in the IndianAmerican story.

The pioneers of the Indian-American community built temples, businesses, cultural centers, professional associations, and media organizations. They gave their children opportunities they themselves did not have.

The next generation must decide what to do with that inheritance.

Will our institutions remain relevant to young people born and raised in America? Will our community measure success only by income, degrees, and prestigious job titles? Or will we also value teachers, artists, social workers, journalists, public servants, and people who choose less conventional paths?

Will we teach children only how to perform a dance for India Day, or will we help them understand the history behind the freedom they are celebrating? Will we expect them to recite prayers without explaining their meaning? Will we tell them to be proud of India while leaving no room for their questions?

Young Indian Americans do not need a perfect India to feel proud of their heritage. They need an honest India—ancient, diverse, wounded, creative, complicated, and still evolving.

They do not need a flawless America in order to love their country. They need an America willing to examine its history and continue widening its circle of belonging.

Our responsibility is not to hand the next generation a fixed identity. It is to provide them strong roots, moral confidence, and the freedom to grow.

One Indian-American Story

One table, many traditions—sharing India’s flavors

India’s 80th Independence Day and America’s 250th anniversary offer more than an unusual alignment of dates. Together, they create a historic moment of reflection for every Indian American.

We are the beneficiaries of two freedom movements.

From India, we inherited the lesson that moral courage can confront even the mightiest empire. From America, we inherited the proposition that rights do not belong only to rulers or inherited classes but to ordinary people.

From India, we learned that unity need not erase diversity. From America, we learned that people from across the world can become part of a shared national story.

From both nations, we learned that democracy is a continuous process. Both nations taught us that democracy is an ongoing process.

The Indian-American community now stands at a new stage of its journey. We are no longer invisible newcomers. Our numbers, accomplishments, and influence have grown. With that success comes an obligation: to serve, participate, build bridges, and protect the democratic freedoms that made our story possible.

This August, as we raise the American and Indian flags together at community gatherings, let us recognize them as more than just two national symbols. Together at community gatherings, let us see more than two national symbols.

A simultaneous flag-raising during a community dual-anniversary celebration in the summer of 2026.

Let us remember the generations who struggled beneath each of them. Let us honor the immigrants who crossed oceans with little more than courage and hope. Let us thank the country that welcomed our labor and ambition and the civilization that gave us our cultural and spiritual foundation.

Most importantly, let us ask what we will contribute to the next chapter.

Two hundred and fifty years after America declared its independence, and on India’s 80th Independence Day, the work of liberty continues. It continues in courtrooms and classrooms, voting booths and houses of worship, family conversations and community institutions. It continues whenever someone chooses service over selfishness, dialogue over hatred, and courage over silence.

We may have come to America from India, or we may have been born here carrying India within us. Either way, we belong to a remarkable story—a story made possible by two nations, two journeys toward freedom, and one community connecting them.

Two flags. Two anthems. Two beloved nations.

And one Indian-American heart, grateful enough to hold both.

About the Author:

A software engineer by profession, Indian culture enthusiast, ardent promoter of  Hinduism, and a cancer survivor, Raj Shah is a managing editor of Desh-Videsh Magazine and co-founder of Desh Videsh Media Group. Promoting the rich culture and heritage of India and Hinduism has been his motto ever since he arrived in the US in 1969.
He has been instrumental in starting and promoting several community organizations such as the Indian Religious and Cultural Center and International Hindu University. Raj has written two books on Hinduism titled Chronology of Hinduism and Understanding Hinduism. He has also written several children books focusing on Hindu culture and religion.

They Are a Dividend America’s Fiscal Strength, Not Burden

A New Look at Immigration and America’s Fiscal Future

For decades, U.S. political debates have painted immigrants as fiscal burdens—taking jobs, consuming welfare, and straining public finances. Yet new economic research has overturned that narrative with compelling data. According to a 2025 Manhattan Institute study by economist Daniel Di Martino, Indian immigrants and their descendants are not only self-sufficient but are also among the strongest contributors to America’s fiscal health.

In an era of mounting national debt—now surpassing $38 trillion—understanding which populations strengthen or strain the economy has never been more crucial. The numbers tell a striking story: Indian immigrants are America’s most fiscally beneficial immigrant group.

“Indian immigrants are not a drain on America — they are a dividend. Each engineer, doctor, teacher, and entrepreneur adds measurable value to the U.S. balance sheet and immeasurable vitality to its social fabric.”

The Numbers Behind the Narrative

The Manhattan Institute report, “The Fiscal Impact of Immigration: 2025 Update,” analyzes how different immigrant groups affect the U.S. economy and federal budget over a 30-year period. It calculates their impact on GDP growth, population, and—most importantly—the national debt.

Among all major national-origin groups, Indians top the fiscal impact chart:

• Each Indian immigrant and their descendants save the U.S. federal government an average of $1.6–$1.7 million over 30 years.
• They also generate the largest per-person GDP increase among all immigrant groups.
• H-1B visa holders, many of whom are Indian, reduce the national debt by $2.3 million each and expand GDP by $500,000 over 30 years—the highest impact ever recorded for any visa type.

By comparison:

• Chinese immigrants reduce debt by around $800,000.
• Filipinos by $600,000.
• Colombians and Venezuelans by $500,000 and $400,000, respectively.
• At the other end, Salvadorans increase national debt by $50,000, and Mexicans by about $10,000 per person.

These findings directly challenge the widespread belief that immigrants add to America’s fiscal burden. Instead, they reveal a powerful truth: educated, skilled, working-age immigrants—especially Indians—help reduce America’s debt while growing its economy.

Why Indian Immigrants Excel

To understand why Indian immigrants deliver such an outsized fiscal return, it helps to look at who they are and how they integrate.

1. Education and Skills
   Indians are the most highly educated immigrant group in the United States. A majority hold bachelor’s or advanced degrees, and many have expertise in STEM, medicine, engineering, and finance. These professions carry higher salaries and generate substantial tax contributions.
2. Working-Age Entry
   Most Indian immigrants arrive in their 20s and 30s—prime working years. This means they contribute taxes for decades before retiring and draw fewer age-related benefits during their initial decades in America.
3. Entrepreneurship and Innovation
   Indian-origin entrepreneurs have founded or led many of America’s top technology and healthcare firms. From Silicon Valley startups to global corporations, Indian professionals create jobs, spur innovation, and expand GDP far beyond their population share.
4. Low Welfare Dependency
   The community’s cultural emphasis on self-reliance, education, and family cohesion results in very low welfare participation rates. This reduces fiscal costs and enhances long-term economic integration.
5. Intergenerational Success
   The children of Indian immigrants typically achieve even higher education and income levels than their parents. This multiplier effect ensures that the second and third generations continue to deliver strong fiscal dividends.

Collectively, these factors explain why the average Indian immigrant produces such a large surplus to the federal budget. As the report notes, fiscal strength correlates closely with education, skill level, and age at arrival—all areas where Indian immigrants excel.

“Fiscal impact shouldn’t be the sole criterion for immigration policy, but it is a crucial and quantifiable measure of long-term national interest.”
— Daniel Di Martino, Manhattan Institute

H-1B Visa Holders: America’s Hidden Asset

The report pays special attention to H-1B visa holders, who represent a large share of Indian immigrants. These skilled professionals—often in technology, medicine, and engineering—are America’s most fiscally positive subgroup.

According to Di Martino’s analysis:

• Each H-1B visa holder reduces the national debt by $2.3 million over 30 years.
• Each contributes roughly $500,000 to GDP growth in the same period.

No other visa class comes close to such impact. H-1B workers embody the “fiscal ideal” of immigration: skilled, productive, self-sufficient, and tax-positive. Yet paradoxically, this group often faces the toughest visa and green-card backlogs—particularly for Indian nationals, who can wait decades for permanent residency.

The report urges U.S. policymakers to double the number of high-skill visas while cutting total immigration by 10%. It also recommends granting more green cards to Indians and temporarily pausing visa quotas for other nations until the Indian backlog clears. Such measures, the author argues, would reduce the national debt by as much as $20 trillion over 30 years while maintaining economic competitiveness.

Illegal vs. Legal Immigration: A Fiscal Contrast

The research highlights the stark contrast between skilled legal immigration and illegal immigration.

• The average undocumented immigrant costs the federal government over $200,000 during their lifetime.
• Each new illegal entrant adds approximately $100,000 in additional costs.
• Deportations, though expensive in the short term ($12,000–$13,000 each), are estimated to pay for themselves within 30 years.

These numbers underline a simple fiscal truth: while high-skill immigrants reduce debt and drive growth, unauthorized immigration imposes long-term costs. The solution isn’t hostility toward immigrants, but smarter selection—one that rewards contribution, education, and legality.

“Each Indian immigrant and their descendants save the federal government an average of $1.7 million over 30 years — the strongest positive fiscal impact of any immigrant group in U.S. history.”

The National Debt Crisis: Why This Matters Now

America’s national debt now exceeds $38 trillion, rising faster than ever outside the pandemic years. Each trillion added compounds inflation, raises borrowing costs, and weakens the next generation’s purchasing power.

Economists like Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton Budget Model warn that unchecked debt leads to:

• Higher interest rates on mortgages and auto loans.
• Reduced business investment and lower wages.
• Persistent inflation that erodes household savings.

In this environment, immigration isn’t just a social issue—it’s a fiscal one. Every policy decision about who enters the country affects long-term national solvency. As Di Martino emphasizes, “Fiscal impact shouldn’t be the sole criterion for immigration policy, but it is a crucial and quantifiable measure of long-term national interest.”

Policy Implications: Toward a Smarter Immigration System

The Manhattan Institute report calls for a pragmatic, merit-based system that prioritizes education, employment, and fiscal contribution. Its core recommendations include:

1. Reduce total legal immigration by 10%, while
2. Doubling high-skill immigration—particularly through H-1B and similar employment-based categories.
3. Increase green-card quotas for Indian professionals and streamline the process to eliminate decades-long waiting times.
4. Use fiscal impact as a measurable benchmark for future immigration reforms.

Such policies could align immigration with fiscal responsibility, ensuring that every newcomer strengthens the national balance sheet rather than burdening it. They would also recognize the proven value of Indian and other high-skill immigrant communities.

For Indian-American Community Leaders: A Call to Action

The study offers more than statistics—it provides a strategic opportunity for Indian-American leaders to advocate for fairer policies and better representation. Key steps include:

• Highlighting contributions: Share these findings in public forums, civic discussions, and media outlets to counter misinformation.
• Political engagement: Encourage voter registration and informed participation in elections, since both major parties influence immigration law.
• Supporting STEM education: Mentor youth, fund scholarships, and strengthen the educational pipeline that has made Indian-Americans leaders in technology, medicine, and entrepreneurship.
• Lobbying for reform: Mobilize community organizations to advocate for backlog relief and transparent H-1B and green-card processes.
• Building coalitions: Partner with other high-impact groups—Chinese, Filipino, and others—to form a united front for merit-based reform.
• Educating policymakers: Present factual, data-driven evidence of the community’s fiscal and social contributions to America.

Community advocacy based on evidence, not emotion, will help reshape how lawmakers and the public perceive skilled immigrants. Numbers have power—but they need voices to amplify them.

Changing the National Conversation

“When immigration is guided by skill, education, and contribution, it doesn’t weaken a nation — it strengthens it.
Indian immigrants prove that smart immigration is smart economics.”

The findings should also reshape how Americans think about immigration in moral and cultural terms. Indian-origin professionals—numbering just over 4 million in a nation of 330 million—represent less than 2% of the population but contribute far beyond that share to national innovation and prosperity.

They are:

• One of the highest-earning ethnic groups, with median household incomes exceeding $140,000.
• Leaders in education, with over 75% holding at least a bachelor’s degree.
• Significant job creators, founding or leading major companies across Silicon Valley, healthcare, and finance.

When viewed through both fiscal and social lenses, the community’s success story is not an exception—it’s a model for how immigration can work best.

Beyond Economics: The Human Dividend

Behind the numbers are stories of individuals and families who exemplify what America values—education, hard work, and civic responsibility. From Indian doctors on the pandemic frontlines to tech innovators driving the digital economy, these immigrants have shaped America’s modern landscape.

Their children, born or raised in the United States, continue this legacy: excelling in universities, leading research labs, and running startups that employ thousands. This is the human dividend—a generational return on investment that statistics alone can’t capture.

A Broader Reflection: Immigration as Leverage

In a time of rising political polarization, the message from the Manhattan Institute’s data is refreshingly unifying. It shows that smart, skill-based immigration doesn’t weaken a nation—it strengthens it.

Indian immigrants exemplify how openness, when coupled with merit, can become an engine of prosperity. They reduce the debt, raise productivity, and expand opportunity. They remind Americans that the question is not whether immigration benefits the country, but what kind of immigration policy serves the national interest.

A Dividend That Keeps Paying

America’s fiscal health and global competitiveness depend not just on domestic policy but on who it chooses to welcome. The evidence is overwhelming: Indian immigrants are not a drain—they are a dividend.

Each engineer, doctor, teacher, and entrepreneur from this community adds measurable value to the U.S. balance sheet and immeasurable vitality to its social fabric.

In the words of economist Daniel Di Martino:

“Fiscal impact shouldn’t be the sole criterion for immigration policy, but it is a crucial and quantifiable measure of long-term national interest. A well-designed policy mix can simultaneously strengthen the federal balance sheet, boost economic growth, and ease assimilation.”

If America truly seeks to rebuild its economy, reduce its debt, and lead the world in innovation, then it must recognize what the data already prove: the path forward is paved by skilled, responsible, and visionary immigrants—and Indians stand at the forefront of that future.

Presented annually on India’s Republic Day,these awards fall into three categories: Padma Vibhushan for extraordinary service, Padma Bhushan for distinguished service of high order, and Padma Shri for notable service in any domain.

“India’s President confers the awards during ceremonies held at Rashtrapati Bhavan in March or April. This year, the President has approved 139 awards, including seven Padma Vibhushan, 19 Padma Bhushan, and 113 Padma Shri. ” The recipients include 23 women, 10 individuals from the Foreign/NRI/PIO/OCI categories, and 13 posthumous awardees.

“The Padma Awards, among India’s highest civilian honors, celebrate exceptional contributions across various fields.”

This year, the Padma Awards have recognized several Indian Americans and Canadians for their groundbreaking work in literature, science, and engineering. I reached out to each winner, and here are their inspiring stories and
responses

Arvind Sharma (Canada)–Literature and Education
The Padma Award recognized Arvind Sharma, a distinguished scholar in comparative religion and Hindu philosophy, for his immense contribution to literature and education. Sharma is a professor at McGill University, Canada. He has devoted decades to research and dialogue among religions. His areas of specialization include Hindu
traditions, religious pluralism, and the role of women in religious scriptures.

A holder of a PhD degree from Harvard University, Sharma has written and edited thousands of books that combine both Eastern and Western perspectives on religion. His book The Philosophy of Religion:

A Buddhist Perspective and the book Hinduism as a Missionary Religion have earned great mileage in terms of their academic credentials. His influences have extended far beyond academia to take his contributions further into the way religions, tolerance, and culture have shaped the discussions.

Accepting the Padma Award, Sharma said that this recognition was not only personal but a tribute to the global appreciation of Indian spiritual traditions.

Vinod Dham (USA)—Science and Engineering
The Padma Bhushan honors Vinod Dham, the “Father of the Pentium Chip,” for his significant contributions to semiconductor technology. An electrical engineer turned venture capitalist, Dham’s pioneering work at Intel revolutionized computing, making personal computers faster and more accessible.

Having been born in India, he pursued a master’s in electrical engineering in the USA, despite having only $8 to his name. His breakthrough came at Intel, where he led the development of the Pentium processor. Later, he played a crucial role in advancing Flash Memory technology.

Besides the engineering marvels, Dham has mentored several startups, which have contributed to the Silicon Valley innovation landscape. His journey is the epitome of the immigrant success story—humble beginnings to the top of the global technology hierarchy. Dham, in his acceptance speech for the award, credited his mother for encouraging
him and said his success was because of perseverance, vision, and a strong foundation in STEM education in India.

Ajay V. Bhatt (USA)—Science and Engineering
The Padma honor recognizes Ajay V Bhatt, the visionary behind the Universal Serial Bus (USB), for his transformative contributions to technology. A celebrated computer architect, Bhatt’s invention of the USB revolutionized how devices connect and communicate.

Born in Vadodara, Gujarat, he pursued his master’s degree in the USA, later joining Intel, where he spearheaded the development of USB technology. His innovation simplified data transfer, making it universally accessible across multiple devices. With 132 international patents, Bhatt’s impact on the tech industry is unparalleled.

Apart from his technical contributions, Bhatt has been an advocate for innovation and mentorship. He believes that the spirit of invention lies in simplifying complexities for everyday users. Reflecting on his award, Bhatt stated
that this recognition highlights India’s significant contributions to global technology and inspires future generations of innovators.

Nitin Nohria (USA)—Literary and Education
The Padma honor recognizes Nitin Nohria, the first foreign-born Dean of Harvard Business School, for his exceptional contributions to business education. A thought leader in management studies, Nohria has played a crucial role in redefining leadership and corporate responsibility.

Born in Rajasthan, he pursued an MBA in Mumbai before earning a PhD from MIT. He has authored several books, including Management: An Integrated Approach and The Handbook of Teaching Leadership. His work highlights the importance of ethical leadership and corporate accountability, arguing that moral principles, akin to the Hippocratic oath in medicine, should guide business decisions.

Nohria, a close associate of business leaders like Mukesh Ambani, made headlines in 2019 as the highest-paid dean of HBS. On receiving the Padma Award, he expressed deep gratitude, stating that his mission has always been to shape responsible and visionary leaders for the global economy.

Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan (USA)—Science and Engineering
The Padma award recognized Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan, the Director of the US National Science Foundation, for his significant contributions to science and technology. An electrical and computer engineering leader, Panchanathan’s research has advanced artificial intelligence and human-centered computing.

Born in Chennai, he studied at IISc Bangalore and IIT Madras before earning his PhD in Canada. His career took him to Arizona State University, where he became Chief Research Officer, fostering innovation in assistive technologies and AI-driven.

When I congratulated Dr.Panchanathan through LinkedIn, he said “I am honored and humbled to receive this recognition. Such recognitions are a reflection of the strong support and contributions from many of my students,
colleagues, friends, and family members. I am deeply grateful to all of them. Looking forward to further strengthening the US-India S&T partnership for the benefit of both nations.”

His work continues to bridge scientific collaborations between India and the USA.

Stephen Knapp (USA)—Literary and Education
Stephen Knapp, known in spiritual circles as Sri Nandanandana Dasa, has dedicated his life to sharing the richness of Vedic culture and Sanatana Dharma with the world. Honored with the Padma Award, his journey spans over 40 years of deep research and spiritual practice, making ancient Indian wisdom accessible to a global audience.

A prolific author, Knapp has penned numerous books that explore Hindu philosophy, history, and its far-reaching influence. Titles like The Secret Teachings of the Vedas and Proof of Vedic Culture’s Global Existence reflect his unique approach—blending scholarly research with personal spiritual insights. His work bridges the gap between academic study and lived experience in the spiritual realm, not only educating but also inspiring.

I also congratulated Mr. Knapp via LinkedIn.
“I was not expecting this award, so it is a wonderful surprise to me. I’m very grateful to the government of India for extending such an award to me for the years of work and writing I have done to help spread the knowledge of Vedic culture and Sanatana Dharma. And I’m very grateful to all those who have helped me along the way, such as my own
spiritual master, Srila Prabhupada. Without that, I don’t know where I would be. Jai Shri Krishna.”

Knapp’s journey exemplifies the deep connections between India’s spiritual heritage and global scholarship.

Mr. Knapp has contributed a few articles to Desh Videsh magazine in the past. We have included his other article, “Self Defense in Vedic Dharma,” in this issue of Desh-Videsh Magazine.

About the Author:

A software engineer by profession, Indian culture enthusiast, ardent promoter of hinduism, and a cancer survivor, Raj Shah is a managing editor of Desh-Videsh Magazine and co-founder of Desh Videsh Media Group. Promoting the rich culture and heritage of India and Hinduism has been his motto ever since he arrived in the US in 1969.

He has been instrumental in starting and promoting several community organizations such as the Indian Religious and Cultural Center and International Hindu University. Raj has written two books on Hinduism titled Chronology of Hinduism and Understanding Hinduism. He has also written several children books focusing on Hindu culture and religion.