Moments That Forced the Trump administration to Recalculate India

Dear Readers,

As you open this issue of Desh-Videsh, you will encounter a powerful and timely cover story—“India Is Winning Under Trump 2.0—And Teaching the World” by Dr. Arvind Suresh. His analysis captures a profound global shift: in an era defined by tariffs, disruption, and transactional diplomacy under Donald Trump, India has not merely adapted—it has accelerated. But this transformation is not accidental. Narendra Modi’s clear strategic vision, executed with precision by External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, underpins this transformation. This editorial builds on that foundation to examine a critical question: what specific moments forced Washington to rethink India—not as a junior partner, but as a decisive global power?

In global politics, there are quiet shifts—and then there are defining signals. Over the past few years, India has delivered a sequence of such signals—each one reinforcing a new reality. Under Modi’s leadership, India articulated a bold doctrine: engage with all, depend on none. Under Jaishankar’s direction, that doctrine was translated into actionable diplomacy—measured, disciplined, and unapologetically aligned with national interest.

The result? A series of moments that made it impossible for the Trump administration to ignore, pressure, or sideline India.

The Oil Decision That Redefined Independence

The Ukraine conflict triggered Western sanctions on Russia, causing many countries to comply. India did not.

Instead, it increased imports of discounted Russian oil—protecting its economy and ensuring energy security for its citizens. This was not defiance for optics; it was strategy in action. Modi’s vision of strategic autonomy met Jaishankar’s calibrated diplomacy, ensuring that India maintained relationships without compromising interests.

President Trump viewed the bold actions taken by PM Modi’s administration as a pivotal moment. India was not a country that would follow—it was a country that would decide.

Modi–Putin Optics: A Clear Strategy

The informal and widely publicized interactions between Narendra Modi and Vladimir Putin sent a powerful global signal.

These moments were not accidental. They reflected a deliberate approach—maintaining engagement even under pressure. Modi’s leadership projected confidence; Jaishankar’s diplomacy ensured balance.

For the Trump administration, the takeaway was clear: India was not drifting—it was navigating, with intent.

BRICS: From Participation to Leadership

The evolution of BRICS into a more assertive global platform further demonstrated India’s rising influence.

India shaped the direction of the bloc—advocating for inclusivity, balance, and reform—rather than allowing others to dominate it. This transformation reflects Modi’s broader vision of India as a global agenda-setter, supported by Jaishankar’s ability to negotiate across competing interests.

For the Trump administration, the outcome signaled a shift: India was no longer just present in global forums—it was influencing them.

Europe Turns to India—And Washington Watches

When leaders like Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, accelerated engagement with India, it reinforced India’s growing centrality in global economics.

The India–EU trade momentum did not emerge in isolation. It was the result of sustained diplomatic outreach and strategic positioning. Modi’s vision created opportunities, while Jaishankar’s execution transformed them into partnerships.

For the Trump administration, the development raised a strategic concern: India was no longer being courted—it was being competed for.

Multi-Alignment as a Strategic Doctrine

India’s participation in forums such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization illustrates a defining feature of its foreign policy: multi-alignment.

This is not passive neutrality. It is active engagement across multiple power centers. Modi articulated this approach clearly—India will engage widely but commit selectively. Jaishankar ensured its disciplined implementation across global platforms.

Again for the Trump administration, this approach required a shift in mindset. India could not be placed within traditional alliance frameworks—it operates beyond them, as it seeks to establish its own unique partnerships and collaborations that reflect its strategic interests and global aspirations.

Supply Chains and Strategic Leverage

As global companies began shifting away from China, India positioned itself as a reliable alternative. This was not a coincidence—it was a preparation meeting opportunity.

Policies, partnerships, and infrastructure investments created an environment where global capital could move with confidence. Modi’s economic vision aligned with Jaishankar’s international outreach, turning disruption into advantage.

For the Trump administration, this created a new reality: India was no longer optional—it was essential.

Strategic Autonomy, Consistently Executed

Across crises and conflicts, India’s responses have reflected consistency and clarity. It engages when beneficial, abstains when necessary, and decides independently.

This is where leadership matters most. Vision without execution remains a theory. Execution without vision lacks direction. India’s strength lies in the combination—Modi’s strategic clarity and Jaishankar’s diplomatic precision.

For the Trump administration, this consistency has forced a recalibration. India is predictable in one way: it will always act in its interest.

A Pattern That Cannot Be Ignored

Taken together, these moments form a clear pattern:

India resisted pressure.
India shaped global platforms.
India expanded economic influence.
India engaged across rival blocs.
India attracted competing global powers.

This is not a country adjusting to global change. This is a country driving it.

And at the center of this transformation are two critical forces: vision and execution.

The Diaspora Dimension

If Modi’s vision and Jaishankar’s execution have elevated India globally, Indian-Americans must now rise to shape outcomes domestically.

Economic success has built credibility. Cultural strength has built identity. Now, political engagement must build influence.

Enter Politics—Don’t Just Observe It

Run for local offices and build a leadership pipeline toward higher positions. Encourage younger generations to pursue public service. Leaders like Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy prove success is possible—but scale is essential.

Vote Consistently, Not Occasionally

Increase voter registration, educate first-generation immigrants, and mobilize youth participation. Focus on primaries as well as general elections. Consistent voting creates visibility—and exposure drives political relevance.

Fund Political Campaigns—Strategically

Support candidates aligned with key issues and engage across party lines. Build community-level fundraising networks. Financial strength must translate into political access.

Build Advocacy Groups and Networks

Create and strengthen organizations that represent Indian-American interests. Develop think tanks and policy platforms. Organized communities shape policy outcomes.

Engage Both Parties—Avoid Political Isolation

Maintain relationships across Republicans and Democrats. Focus on issues over identity. Influence both sides—so access remains regardless of political shifts.

Shape the Narrative Through Representation

Increase presence in media, policy roles, and government positions. Encourage internships in Washington, D.C. Representation changes perception—and perception influences policy.

Invest in Political Education

Educate communities about civic engagement and the importance of local elections. Use platforms like Desh-Videsh to inform and mobilize. An informed community is an empowered community.

Build Long-Term Institutional Influence

Develop PACs, mentorship programs, and leadership pipelines. Focus on long-term systems, not short-term wins. Sustainable influence requires institutional strength.

The Final Word

What we are witnessing today is not accidental momentum. It is the result of clear leadership, disciplined execution, and strategic confidence.

For the Trump administration, the lesson is now undeniable:

India is not a country you pressure.
India is a country you partner with.

And for Indian-Americans, the message is equally powerful:

You are no longer just participants in the American story.
You are positioned to shape it.

Because when vision meets execution—as it has under Modi and Jaishankar—change is not gradual.

It is decisive.

Raj Shah,
Managing Editor,
Deshvidesh Media Group.

In the 33-year journey of Desh-Videsh Magazine, this is the very first time I am writing an editorial column—and that too, to share my deeply personal feelings about my husband, my life partner. I hope our readers will understand and appreciate the emotion behind these words, because this moment marks one of the most significant and meaningful milestones in both Rajni’s life and mine.

On March 20, 2026, we had the immense joy and privilege of celebrating Rajni’s 80th birthday—an evening that will remain etched in our hearts forever. This was not just a celebration of age, but a celebration of a life filled with purpose, resilience, faith, and service. As I stood surrounded by our family members and dear friends, I felt a deep sense of gratitude. Rajni and I are truly thankful to each one of you who joined us—your presence made the evening warm, meaningful, and unforgettable.

Over the years, I have witnessed Rajni’s journey closely—from his early beginnings in India to building a life of integrity and accomplishment in America. His path has never been easy, but it has always been guided by values, determination, and an unwavering belief in doing what is right. Beyond all achievements, what defines Rajni most is his love for family, his humility, and his commitment to giving back to society.

One of the most moving moments of the evening was Rajni’s heartfelt speech, “Eighty Years — A Sacred Journey.” As he spoke, the room fell into a profound silence. His words carried emotion, reflection, and spiritual depth. It was not merely a recounting of his life, but a powerful reminder that life’s true meaning lies in gratitude, resilience, and service. His message touched everyone present and left a lasting impression on all of us.

As his life partner, I have had the honor of walking beside him through every phase of this journey—through challenges, growth, andcountless blessings. This celebration was not only about looking back at eighty years, but also about appreciating the love, relationships, and purpose that continue to guide us forward.

I have also taken the liberty of sharing Rajni’s entire speech in its original poetic form in the following pages. It is my humble way of preserving not just his words, but the emotion, depth, and spiritual essence that touched all of us that evening.

With heartfelt gratitude,
Aruna Shah
Publisher, Desh-Videsh Magazine

“Eighty Years — A Sacred Journey”

Tonight, I do not stand before you
As a man who simply turned eighty.
I stand here as a pilgrim —
Grateful for every step of the journey.

I was born in the soil of my Matrubhumi, Bharat
Where faith rose before the sun,
Where my mother’s whispered prayers
Were the first victories I won.

I carried no riches across the ocean —
Only values stitched into my soul:
Bhakti in my breath,
Dharma as my goal.

Then America became my Karmabhumi —
Not just a land of opportunity,
But a battlefield of growth.

The early years were not easy.
New language. New culture. New skies.
No safety net beneath my feet —
Only determination in my eyes.

I worked hard.
I worked quietly.
I worked with giants — Fortune 500 towers of steel and glass.
I learned. I built. I earned trust.
I let integrity become my compass.

But something inside me whispered —
“Build your own path.”

So I stepped into risk.
One business rose.
Then another.
Then three stood tall.

Yes, one fell.
And yes, it hurt.

But life taught me early —
Failure is not defeat.
It is training.
It is fire shaping steel.

And through every ambition,
Through every uncertain leap,
One presence stood unwavering — Aruna.

Not just my wife,
But my anchor.
My courage in quiet form.
When storms gathered without warning,
She was my calm in the storm.

If I built anything in this life,
It is because we built it together.

Then came the true wealth of my life —
My sons.

Two bright lights
Who turned a house into a home.
In their laughter I heard music.
In their growth, I saw purpose.

And as life unfolded,
Blessings multiplied —

Two daughters-in-law
Who did not just join our family —
They strengthened it.
They brought grace.
They brought warmth.
They brought love that expanded our world.

And then —

Four grandchildren.

Four living miracles.
Four reasons to fight harder.
Four reminders that life is not behind me —
It continues forward.

Then came the battle I did not choose —
Cancer.

It knocked without warning.
It tested my body.
It tested my spirit.

But I was not alone.

My family became my armor.
My friends became my shield.
Even strangers sent prayers
That I could feel.

In hospital rooms and silent nights,
When machines hummed and fear whispered,
I remembered the Gita —”The Bhagavad Gita”

The soul cannot be broken.
The Self cannot be burned.

And when weakness said, “Rest,”
My grandchildren’s laughter said, “Stay.”
When doubt said, “It is too hard,”
Love answered, “Not today.”

I did not fight alone.
We fought together.

And by grace —
I stand here today.

Eighty years.

Not just years of work.
Not just years of success.
But years of learning
That life’s true measure is service.

Today, my joy is not in what I earned —
But in what I can give.

In feeding children through Akshaya Patra,
In serving community,
In seeing divinity in every child’s smile —
I found the deeper meaning of living.

Then, a quiet light entered my path —
Not through struggle, but through awakening.
When Sister Shivani came to South Florida,
Her words touched not just the mind, but the soul.

In her simplicity, I found depth,
In her silence, I found answers.
She showed me not to change the world, but myself —
And led me to the Brahma Kumaris, a path of peace and inner power.

Matrubhumi gave me roots.
Karmabhumi gave me wings.
“The Bhagavad Gita”  gave me steadiness
Through all life’s changing things.

I have stumbled.
I have risen.
I have lost.
I have won.

But the greatest victory of my life
Is standing here surrounded by love.

If I have learned anything in eighty years,
It is this:

Struggle is sacred.
Work is worship.
Family is fortune.
Service is freedom.

And gratitude —
Gratitude is everything.

So tonight, I do not celebrate age.
I celebrate grace.
I celebrate resilience.
I celebrate all of you —
Who made this journey beautiful.

At eighty, I am not at the end.
I am simply at a higher vantage point —
Able to see how every battle,
Every blessing,
Every tear,
Every triumph
Was part of a sacred design.

And if tomorrow comes —
As I pray it does —
I will greet it the same way I greeted the first day in this country:

With faith in my heart,
Courage in my step,
And service as my purpose.

Thank you
For walking this journey with me.

Marriage, Maturity, and Timing: A Perspective from Hindu Culture

Dr. Piyush Agrawal

There was a very thought-provoking article in the Desh Videsh in the month of December 2025, written by the managing editor of the monthly, Shri Raj Shah, about

The article discussed weddings within the context of Hindu culture.

It is an excellent article worthy of reading by all, but it raises certain issues worthy of being addressed. Hence, this article.

Human life is one of the greatest gifts of nature, and mostly the cycle of human life is governed by the laws of nature. The activities of the human body in the life cycle are all well-defined and they take place in a sequence in a predictable order.

For example, Puberty does not happen during childhood, nor does it happen during mid-life. Having said that there is a time in life to get married, which is about the age of 25.

Though human beings are intelligent enough to tweak nature’s design wherever possible, those variables are not consistent with nature’s expectations and sometimes have adverse consequences.

The basic issue raised by Mr. Shah was to support the idea of getting married after the age of 30 with an outstanding narrative to justify that.

The purpose of this article is to support the idea of getting married around the age of 25.

For the following reasons:

1. The individuals: the boy and the girl are in the process of maturation and have not fully mature enough to start thinking they are right: their way or the highway.
2. The issue of compatibility between the boy and the girl in married life is extremely important, and an “adjustment” in behavior becomes essential for a mooth sailing in life. If their views are fixed at the “mature” level, adjustment may become questionable.
3.  Emotional adjustment is very important, and at the age of around 25 the boy and the Girls are more adaptable to each other than at the age of 30 plus.
4. In the context of Hindu culture, where marriages used to be arranged, it was an opportunity for the boy and the girl to explore the goodness of a married life at an immature age of 25 while creating a growing family.
5. While the husband and wife are in the process of maturation and adjustment, the Children are also growing, and collectively the whole family is in the similar mode of growing together, which provides a better family environment.

About the Author

Dr. Piyush Agrawal is a distinguished educator, successful entrepreneur, and dedicated community leader. With six university degrees, more than two dozen publications, and numerous awards, he has built an impressive professional record. After serving as a classroom teacher for 40 years, he later became superintendent of schools and also transformed APS Technologies, Inc. and Allied Joint Venture, LLC into thriving businesses.

Dr. Agrawal has also played an important role in public service, serving on the U.S. Census Advisory Committee on Asian and Pacific Islander Populations and on several Florida state boards. He has been actively involved in many civic organizations, including serving as national president of the Association of Indians in America and senior vice president of GOPIO International. A committed philanthropist, he funded a girls’ college in his home village in India and helped install a Mahatma Gandhi statue in Davie, Florida. He is also credited with requesting President George W. Bush to begin celebrating Diwali at the White House, which started in 2003 and continues today.

Marriage After 30 and the Divorce Question in the Indian-American Community

By Dr. Kavita Iyer

Recently, while reading the discussion around the Desh-Videsh editorial on why many Indian-Americans are choosing to marry after 30, I noticed an insightful comment posted on the magazine’s Facebook page by Apurva Desai. He pointed out that the conversation should also address another important issue—the rising number of divorces among this new generation and whether marrying in the mid-30s plays a role.

As an Indian-American licensed marriage and family therapist in the San Francisco Bay Area, I work closely with South Asian professionals navigating relationships, marriage, and family expectations. Many of my clients are highly educated individuals in fields such as technology, medicine, law, and finance. Increasingly, they are choosing to marry in their early or mid-30s rather than their mid-20s.

This shift reflects many positive changes. Young professionals today want emotional compatibility, career stability, and personal clarity before entering marriage. Financial independence and maturity often make couples better prepared for long-term commitment.

However, Apurave Desai’s question about divorce trends is worth discussing.

Research from organizations such as the National Marriage Project and the U.S. Census Bureau suggests that divorce rates tend to follow a U-shaped pattern related to age at marriage. Couples who marry very young—before age 22—have the highest divorce rates. The risk of divorce decreases steadily for couples marrying between ages 25 and 30, which researchers often describe as the most stable window for marriage.

Interestingly, some studies suggest that after the early 30s, the likelihood of divorce begins to rise slightly again. This does not mean that marrying later causes divorce. But it does highlight certain lifestyle realities that affect couples who marry later.

In my counseling practice, I often see couples who are exceptionally successful professionally but find the adjustment to marriage more complex than expected. By their mid-30s, individuals have spent more than a decade building independent lives—establishing routines, financial habits, and personal expectations. When two independent individuals come together, learning to compromise, share decision-making, and adapt to each other’s lifestyle can take time.

Another factor is career intensity. For many Indian-American professionals, the early and mid-30s are peak career years. Promotions, relocations, startup ventures, and long work hours can create pressure during the first years of marriage.

Expectations also play a role. People who marry later often have a very clear vision of what they want in a partner and in a relationship. While clarity is valuable, rigid expectations can sometimes make conflict resolution more difficult.

That said, it is important to keep the broader perspective in mind. Indian-Americans still maintain divorce rates significantly lower than the overall U.S. average, largely due to strong family values, cultural support systems, and a deep respect for commitment.

Ultimately, the success of a marriage depends far less on the exact age at which it begins and far more on the readiness of the individuals involved. Emotional maturity, communication skills, shared values, and mutual respect remain the true foundations of lasting relationships.

Apurave Desai’s comment highlights an important truth: conversations about marriage timing should include honest discussions about relationship expectations and preparation for partnership.

Whether someone marries at 27 or 35, the goal is the same—to build a relationship grounded in understanding, patience, and the willingness to grow together over time.

About the Author

Dr. Kavita Iyer is an Indian-American licensed marriage and family therapist based in the San Francisco Bay Area. She specializes in relationship dynamics among South Asian professionals, focusing on cross-cultural marriages, delayed marriage trends, and work-life balance challenges faced by immigrant communities. Dr. Iyer has over 15 years of counseling experience and frequently speaks on modern relationship patterns within the Indian-American diaspora.

A Young Indian-American Woman Reflects on the “Marry After 30” Trend

By Kavya Srinivasan, 28, Fremont, California

Like many Indian-American women of my generation, I always believed there was no rush to get married. I am 28 years old, live in Fremont, California, and work as a product manager at a technology company in Silicon Valley. My boyfriend, whom I met during graduate school, is also a young professional in the tech industry. We have been dating for two years, and until recently, our plan seemed very clear.

We told our families that we loved each other and were serious about our relationship—but we were not planning to marry for another five years. Our reasoning was simple: focus on our careers, travel a little, enjoy independence, and think about marriage sometime in our mid-30s.

To us, that timeline felt modern and sensible.

Then I happened to read the December 2025 editorial in Desh-Videsh Magazine written by Raj Shah, which discussed the rising trend of Indian-Americans marrying after the age of 30.

The article was thoughtful and balanced. It acknowledged that marrying later often brings advantages such as emotional maturity, financial stability, and clearer career direction. Those arguments made sense to me because they reflected how many of us in the Indian-American community think today.

But one particular message in the editorial stayed with me.

Raj Shah wrote that while marriage after 30 is becoming more common, the late 20s are often the ideal time to start seriously considering marriage, because this stage of life offers flexibility, emotional openness, and a wider pool of compatible partners.

That perspective made me pause.

For the first time, I began questioning whether we were truly being thoughtful—or simply postponing an important decision because our generation assumes we have unlimited time.

At 28, my boyfriend and I are still shaping our future. Our careers are growing, but they are not yet locked into rigid paths. We are deciding where we want to live, how we want to balance professional ambition with family life, and what kind of home we want to build.

Reading the editorial made me realize something simple yet powerful: marriage is not just about timing—it is about growing together.

If we marry in the next couple of years, we will make many of life’s big decisions as partners. Waiting until our mid-30s might mean merging two very established lives, with habits and expectations that are harder to blend.

The article also reminded me that in Hindu culture, marriage is not just a social milestone. It is a sacred partnership—a samskara—meant to support emotional growth, family continuity, and shared purpose.

Modern life has given our generation incredible opportunities. We pursue higher education, ambitious careers, and independence in ways our parents never imagined.

But independence does not mean delaying every meaningful step in life.

After reading Raj Shah’s editorial, I had a long conversation with my boyfriend. For the first time, instead of automatically saying “maybe in five years,” we asked a different question.

Why wait so long if we already know we want to build a life together?

We are not rushing—but we are no longer assuming that marriage must wait until our mid-30s.

Sometimes a thoughtful article can quietly change how you see your future.

For me, that moment came while reading the December issue of Desh-Videsh.

Comments from Desh-Videsh Facebook Page:

Very well articulated !!!

You did not cover the very high percentage of divorce among this new generation and what factors getting married in their mid 30s plays…

Apurva R Desai

Well articulated!

Smeeta Patel

A very important topic that is consuming the parents of kids of marriageable age is Kids have been facing distrust among the kids of their own generation. Why?

Sanjiv Anand

So true. I was among the last few of my friends to get married in my early 30s. The main reason was stability and a path forward (in the USA).

Neeraj Mendiratta

Religious Intolerance — And the Courage to Accept Other Faiths as Our Own

It is often said—almost as social wisdom—“Never discuss politics or religion with friends and family.” These two subjects ignite emotions. They test loyalties. They can fracture relationships that took years to build.

But what about discussions on religion in public spaces? What happens when deeply held beliefs are not whispered at dinner tables but declared boldly in open forums?

Two weeks ago, I had an experience that forced me to confront this question directly.

At a public community event in South Florida, several organizations had set up booths. Among them was a local church operated by members of the Indian community. Out of curiosity—and perhaps habit—I walked up to the booth and began a conversation about religion.

What began as a polite exchange soon turned intense.

One of the non-Indian church members made a statement that was both familiar and startling in its directness. I have heard it before. I have read it in books and online debates. But never had I encountered it so plainly, face-to-face, in a one-on-one conversation.

He said, “Christ is the only way to salvation.” He went further: “All other religions are fake imitations of Christianity.”

For a moment, I paused.

As someone who has spent decades promoting Hindu values, culture, and philosophy—through publishing, community events, and personal dialogue—I could not let such a statement pass without response.

I reminded him that Christianity has existed for a little over 2,000 years. Human civilization stretches back far beyond that. Was he suggesting that every soul who lived before the birth of Christ—across continents and civilizations—was denied salvation?

Were the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Native Americans, Chinese sages, Vedic rishis, and countless generations of seekers simply condemned by chronology? And what about the assertion that all other religions are “fake imitations”?

I pointed out that respected historians and scholars—many of them not Hindu—have documented that Hindu traditions date back more than 5,000 years. If age alone were the measure of authenticity, then one could argue, with equal audacity, that newer religions are imitations of older spiritual traditions.

But reflection demands honesty. Religious intolerance does not always shout. Sometimes it hides behind certainty. Sometimes it appears in the form of exclusivity—“Only my path is valid.” Yet intolerance does not belong to one religion alone. It is a human weakness.

A few days prior to that public exchange, someone shared another incident with me, leaving me equally unsettled. 

A Hindu family shared with me the story of their young daughter attending a Catholic school. On the day of Diwali, she went to school wearing a small bindi on her forehead. For her, it was not a political statement. It was not an act of defiance. It was an expression of joy—of culture, of tradition, of celebrating the Festival of Lights.

As soon as the school principal saw the bindi, he reportedly rubbed it off her forehead and told her not to wear “something like that” in school.

Pause for a moment and absorb that image.

A child.
A sacred festival.
A tiny dot of identity.
Erased.

One may argue that schools have dress codes. One may argue about uniformity. But we must ask a deeper question: Would the same action have been taken if a student wore a cross necklace? Would a Christmas symbol have been removed? Would an Ash Wednesday cross on the forehead have been wiped away?

The issue here is not about attacking Catholic institutions. It is about examining double standards. It is about asking whether religious freedom truly applies equally—or selectively.

For that young girl, what message was sent?

That her faith is unwelcome? That her identity must be hidden? That assimilation requires erasure?

America prides itself on religious liberty. The First Amendment protects freedom of belief and expression. Yet real freedom is not measured by laws alone. It is measured by daily experiences—especially those of children.

For immigrant communities, these moments carry emotional weight. Parents choose schools hoping for academic excellence and moral grounding. They do not expect their children’s cultural expressions to be dismissed.

Religious intolerance is not always dramatic. It does not always come with shouting or violence. Sometimes it comes quietly—in small acts that communicate exclusion.

The booth conversation and the bindi incident may seem unrelated, but they are connected by a common thread: the belief that one religious identity holds superiority over others.

In the first case, the superiority was theological: “Only my religion leads to salvation.” In the second case, it was institutional: “Your symbol does not belong here.” Both reflect a discomfort with pluralism.

And yet, pluralism is the reality of modern America—especially in places like South Florida. Temples, churches, mosques, and synagogues stand within miles of each other. Our children sit in the same classrooms. Our businesses serve diverse communities. We weave our neighborhoods together.

In such an environment, religious intolerance is not just morally troubling—it is socially unsustainable.

Hindu philosophy offers a powerful counterpoint.  The ancient declaration from the Rig Veda—

“Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti”  Meaning Truth is one; the wise call it by many names.

This is not merely poetic. It is civilizational wisdom. It does not demand uniformity. It allows diversity. True pluralism does not require abandoning conviction. It requires holding conviction without contempt.

There is a profound difference between saying, “This is my path, and I believe in it wholeheartedly,” and saying, “Your path is false, inferior, or invalid.” The first statement invites dialogue. The second closes the door.

The bindi incident also challenges us internally. As Hindus and Indian Americans, are we equally respectful of others’ symbols? Do we defend the rights of all communities—or only when our own is affected? Acceptance is not agreement. Respect is not surrender.

When I reflect on my exchange at that booth, I recognize that intellectual arguments alone do not resolve intolerance. History, chronology, and scriptural citations may win debates—but they rarely win hearts. What transforms hearts is exposure, empathy, and experience.

Perhaps that church member has never studied Hindu philosophy deeply. Perhaps that school principal has never understood what a bindi represents auspiciousness, spiritual focus, and cultural pride.

Ignorance is not always malicious. Sometimes it is simply an unexamined habit. But unexamined habits, when institutionalized, become discrimination.

If religion is meant to elevate humanity, then its measure cannot be exclusivity. It must be compassion.

Jesus preached love. Krishna taught duty grounded in dharma. Buddha emphasized compassion. Prophet Muhammad spoke of mercy.

Yet followers across traditions sometimes use sacred teachings to draw boundaries rather than build bridges.

As community leaders, publishers, and parents, we must model a different path. Our children are watching how we respond to intolerance. If they see anger alone, they will inherit resentment. If they see dignity combined with courage, they will inherit strength.

The young girl whose bindi was wiped away may grow up remembering that moment. The question is, will she remember it as humiliation—or as motivation to stand proudly in her identity?

Religious confidence does not require suppressing others. True spirituality is not insecure. It does not fear comparison. It does not demand erasure. It does not depend on declaring others wrong to feel right.

The Earth is older than any single religion. Humanity’s spiritual search predates all organized institutions. Across centuries and continents, people have looked at the same sky and asked the same eternal questions. 

Different languages.
Different rituals.
Different symbols.
One shared human longing.

Perhaps we should not avoid discussions about religion in public spaces. Instead, we should elevate them. Let them be conversations rooted in curiosity rather than conquest. Religious intolerance begins when humility disappears. Acceptance begins when humility returns.

And in a world increasingly divided by ideology, the courage to honor another’s faith—while remaining steadfast in our own—may be the highest expression of faith itself.

Let me close this editorial by reiterating the Universal Peace Prayer from Hindu Scripture.

Om Asato Maa Sad-Gamaya |

Tamaso Maa Jyotir-Gamaya |

Mrtyor-Maa Amrtam Gamaya |

Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih ||

Om, lead me from the  world of unreality to the reality of the eternal self,
Lead me. From the Darkness of Ignorance towards the Light of Spiritual Knowledge,

Lead me from the world of mortality  towards the world of immortality of self-realization,

Om, peace, peace, peace.

Raj Shah,
Managing Editor,
Deshvidesh Media Group.

Dear Readers,

U.S.-India 2025: Strains, Shifts, and Modi’s Resilience

For more than two decades, India–U.S. relations have been described as one of the quiet success stories of modern geopolitics. From the suspicion and distance of the Cold War era, the two democracies steadily built a relationship anchored in shared interests—trade, technology, counterterrorism, defense cooperation, and people-to-people ties. By the early 2020s, India had emerged as a central pillar of Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy, while the United States became one of India’s most important strategic partners.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2023 state visit to Washington symbolized this evolution. The rare sight of bipartisan applause in the U.S. Congress suggested that India had achieved something extraordinary: consensus in an otherwise deeply polarized American political environment. Many believed the partnership had matured beyond personalities and electoral cycles.

Yet the return of Donald Trump to the White House in 2025 fundamentally altered the tone and assumptions underpinning this relationship.

Some commentators have portrayed this phase as one in which India was pressured, sidelined, or forced to compromise. That interpretation, however, overlooks a critical reality.

Prime Minister Modi did not bow to Trump’s pressure.
Instead, India responded with strategic confidence—reasserting autonomy, diversifying partnerships, and recalibrating its global posture without abandoning engagement with Washington.

The End of Comfort—and the Beginning of Clarity

India entered Trump’s second term without hostility and without illusions. Public opinion in India remained largely favorable toward Trump, and memories of the personal rapport between Modi and Trump during the first term lingered. But New Delhi never mistook personal chemistry for structural alignment.

That distinction became painfully clear with the release of the U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS) 2025.

As analyzed by Dr. Rahul Mishra and other strategic thinkers, the NSS signaled a sharp departure from previous American assumptions. The Indo-Pacific—once the centerpiece of U.S. strategy—was deprioritized. India, previously framed as a key partner in balancing China, was mentioned only in passing. Even more striking was Washington’s softened language toward China and Russia, suggesting an openness to accommodation rather than confrontation.

For India, the result was not merely disappointing—it was clarifying.

The premise that India’s rise was strategically indispensable to Washington was suddenly called into question. But rather than react defensively, India adjusted calmly, guided by a principle deeply embedded in its foreign policy tradition: strategic autonomy.

Tariffs, Pressure, and the Limits of Coercion

If strategic neglect unsettled New Delhi, economic coercion tested it.

The Trump administration imposed steep tariffs—some reaching 50 percent—on Indian exports, among the highest levied on any U.S. trading partner. The hardest hit sectors were textiles, seafood, and light manufacturing, which employ millions in India. These measures were not subtle; they were explicitly political.

The message was clear: reduce energy imports from Russia or face economic consequences.

India did not comply.

New Delhi continued buying Russian oil and did not accept Washington’s moral framing of India’s energy security. Instead, it responded pragmatically—absorbing short-term shocks, redirecting exports, and accelerating trade diversification toward Europe, East Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

Crucially, Trump’s maximalist pressure did not fully materialize into sustained action. Several tariff threats were delayed, diluted, or quietly rolled back as U.S. importers, consumers, and businesses began to feel the economic backlash. In practice, Trump backed down on the most extreme measures, choosing bluster over escalation.

India, meanwhile, stayed its course.

Sovereignty Is Not a Negotiating Chip

Perhaps the most diplomatically sensitive flashpoint came with Trump’s repeated public claims that he had personally de-escalated tensions between India and Pakistan during the May 2025 crisis.

For New Delhi, these statements crossed a red line.

India has been unequivocal for decades: Kashmir is a bilateral matter, and third-party mediation is unacceptable. Rather than issue ambiguous clarifications or quiet corrections, India publicly and firmly rejected Trump’s assertions.

There was no concession. No recalibration. No silence.

Trump eventually stopped repeating the claim.

In diplomacy, this episode mattered far beyond headlines. It signaled that India would not trade sovereignty for goodwill, nor would it allow external narratives—however powerful the source—to redefine its red lines.

The China Question and the Illusion of a G-2

One of the most consequential developments during Trump 2.0 has been Washington’s evolving posture toward Beijing. Across multiple analyses, a troubling pattern emerges: Trump appears increasingly intrigued by the idea of a U.S.–China “G-2”—a condominium of great powers managing global affairs through transactional bargains.

The NSS 2025 reinforces this perception by framing China primarily as an economic competitor rather than a strategic adversary. Trump’s renewed outreach to President Xi Jinping, willingness to compromise on trade, and relative neglect of the Quad have raised alarms across Asia.

For India, this shift strikes at the heart of the strategic logic that drove India–U.S. convergence over the past two decades. If Washington is prepared to accommodate China’s regional ambitions, India’s role as a balancing partner becomes secondary—regardless of its demographic, economic, or military weight.

India did not protest loudly. It adapted.

While remaining firm on border security and sovereignty, New Delhi cautiously reopened diplomatic channels with Beijing to manage tensions and avoid miscalculation. Engagement, in this context, was not appeasement—it was prudence.

Modi’s Multi-Directional Diplomacy

Contrary to narratives of isolation, India under Modi has expanded its global engagement during this period.

Russia: India maintained its long-standing strategic relationship with Moscow, rooted in defense cooperation and energy security. This was not ideological alignment but national interest—pursued transparently and unapologetically.

Middle East: Ties with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Israel, and Egypt deepened across energy, infrastructure, technology, and regional diplomacy. India emerged as a trusted, non-intrusive partner in a volatile region.

Europe: Engagement with France, Germany, and the European Union accelerated, particularly in defense manufacturing, green energy, and advanced technology. Europe increasingly views India as a stable counterweight in a fractured global order.

Indo-Pacific Partners: Japan and Australia remain central to India’s outlook, even as U.S. enthusiasm for multilateral frameworks has wavered.

Global South: India has continued to position itself as a voice for developing nations—advocating debt relief, development financing, and equitable global governance.

This was not a drift. It was designed.

Restrictions on H-1B visas—disproportionately affecting Indian professionals and the Indian-American community—found strong political support within Trump’s base. Meanwhile, Trump’s unexpected warmth toward Pakistan, including high-level engagements and new transactional deals, underscored how dramatically U.S. South Asia policy had shifted.

India did not attempt to compete in flattery or transactional theatrics. Its democratic culture and institutional norms simply do not permit such an approach.

What Has Endured—and What Has Not

Despite turbulence, the India–U.S. relationship has not collapsed.

Defense cooperation continues. Institutional dialogues remain active. A long-term defense framework has been renewed. The completion of the Tahawwur Rana extradition process—though initiated earlier—was finalized during this period.

But trust has been eroded.

India can no longer assume U.S. support in a crisis with China. Nor can it rely on Washington as a predictable strategic anchor. These are not emotional conclusions; they are structural assessments.

A Strategic Reckoning—Handled with Poise

Faced with this reality, India has not retreated—it has recalibrated.

The tariff shock accelerated export diversification. Diplomatic hedging became more deliberate. Engagement with Washington continues, but without illusions or dependency.

Above all, India has learned a durable lesson: personal relationships between leaders are no substitute for institutional reliability.

As several analysts observe, placing excessive faith in Modi’s rapport with Trump proved unviable. But the outcome was not weakness—it was clarity.

A Test Not Just for India, but also for America

In the long run, Trump’s approach may harm the United States as much as it inconvenienced India. Alienating reliable partners while experimenting with accommodations for adversaries weakens credibility. Allies adapt; adversaries coordinate.

India will endure.

Its economic trajectory remains strong. Its demographic dividend is unmatched. Its geopolitical relevance—spanning the Indo-Pacific, Middle East, and Global South—is undeniable.

Trump 2.0 has tested India–U.S. relations, but it has also revealed something more important: India’s rise is no longer contingent on any single partnership.

Prime Minister Modi did not bow. He recalibrated.
India was not isolated. It diversified.
And where pressure was applied without respect, India stood firm—and Trump, on multiple fronts, ultimately backed down.

From bonhomie to strategic autonomy, this phase marks not a setback, but a maturation.

For New Delhi, realism—not romance—will guide the future.

Raj Shah,
Managing Editor,
Deshvidesh Media Group.

Dear Readers,

In this editorial, I am taking a brief step away from my usual reflections on culture, Hindu values, and the spiritual beauty of Indian weddings. Instead, I am addressing a topic that is far more personal, far more debated—and yes, a bit controversial within our community: the rising trend of Indian-Americans getting married after the age of 30.

Not too long ago, life in our community followed a predictable rhythm. By their mid-20s, most young Indian men and women were expected to be “settled”—a word that carried the weight of tradition, family pride, cultural continuity, and a sense of stability. Everything unfolded at what many believed was the “right time” and on the “right track”—a solid career, respectable biodata, families meeting over chai, and wedding cards being finalized.

But today, as I attend weddings across the country and speak with families in the Indian-American diaspora, I see a very different pattern emerging. More and more couples are choosing to marry after 30. And let me be clear: this change is not simply a phase or a temporary shift. It reflects a more profound transformation in how young Indian-Americans define success, identity, independence, and partnership as they navigate the realities of two cultures.

Having covered weddings for decades through Desh-Videsh, I believe we must approach this change with honesty and empathy. Marrying later brings many undeniable advantages—but it also introduces challenges that deserve thoughtful discussion.

Here is my candid perspective on what is shaping this new landscape.

Why More Indian-Americans Are Choosing to Marry After 30

Emotional Maturity Creates Stronger Foundations

By their early 30s, most individuals have lived enough life—career ups and downs, changing cities, friendships that shaped them, and relationships that taught them boundaries. This emotional grounding leads to healthier, calmer, and more intentional partnerships.

Financial Stability Reduces Stress

A major benefit of marrying after 30 is financial security. Many individuals have stable careers, fewer loans, and greater savings. This allows couples to plan their lives without the strain of financial uncertainty.

They Know What They Want

At 22, a person believes they know what they want. At 32, they actually know. Values, religious preferences, long-term goals, and lifestyle expectations—clarity is stronger in the 30s. For Indian-Americans balancing Western independence with Indian cultural expectations, this clarity becomes invaluable.

Careers Are Defined

The 20s are for exploration; the 30s are for direction.
Whether in medicine, tech, law, entrepreneurship, or the arts, individuals in their 30s understand their professional trajectory and choose partners who support that reality.

Independence Builds Stronger Marriages

Living independently—paying bills, running a home, balancing life—creates confidence. When two independent adults come together, the marriage rests on equality and shared responsibility.

But Let’s Be Honest: Marrying After 30 Has Its Challenges

The Dating Pool Shrinks

By the early 30s, many potential partners within the Indian community were already married. This can make the search more stressful and narrow.

Family Pressure Intensifies

Parents may be modern, but concerns remain:

• “Will my child find someone suitable?”
• “Will they have enough time to start a family?” 
• “Are they being too selective?” 
  

What the couple sees as perfect timing often feels delayed for the parents.

Established Habits Are Harder to Merge

Routines, including sleep patterns, financial habits, and lifestyle choices, become firmly established after 10 years of adult life. Merging two well-formed lives takes patience and compromise.

Biological Realities Cannot Be Ignored

Fertility becomes a practical concern for women in their 30s. While IVF, egg freezing, and adoption offer options, the emotional and financial stress is real.

Career Pressure Peaks

Indian-Americans in their 30s often experience peak career demands—relocations, long hours, promotions, and entrepreneurial risks. Balancing this with early married life requires intentional effort.

Emotional Baggage Accumulates

Past relationships, heartbreaks, and trust issues—these may impact new partnerships. Honest communication becomes essential.

A Cultural Shift, Not a Crisis

Marrying after 30 is not a problem—it is a reflection of modern life. Higher education, mobility, career opportunities, and self-development have expanded timelines.

But every choice has trade-offs. The key is not the age you marry—it is your readiness.

Some are ready at 23; others at 33. Both can succeed with the right mindset.

A Personal Message to Men and Women—Whether You Are Over 30 or Under 30

To those marrying in their 30s, let me speak honestly— this is later than what earlier generations considered ideal. But you enter marriage now with maturity, clarity, and confidence. Your timing may be later, but your choice is thoughtful, deliberate, and respectable.

Now, to those under 30:

Your late 20s are the ideal time to start taking the search for a life partner seriously.

Not because you are “young,” and not because tradition demands it—but because your late 20s give you:

• Flexibility
• Emotional openness
• Less pressure
• A wider pool of compatible partners
• The ability to grow with someone
  

This is not a call to rush. This is a reminder to keep the search on track.

Parents: Stop Sending Mixed Signals

I must also speak to the parents—because we often unintentionally shape our children’s timelines. One of the biggest problems I see is the contradictory advice we give. When our sons or daughters are in their junior or senior year of college or completing a master’s program, we tell them, “Concentrate on your studies; you are too young to contemplate relationships.” Yet the moment they graduate, we suddenly expect them to be ready for marriage. This mixed message creates confusion and pressure. Instead, let us provide consistent guidance. Encourage academic focus, yes—but also let them know it is perfectly acceptable to get to know someone respectfully and thoughtfully during these years. Healthy relationships do not derail success—they often support emotional balance and maturity. Our children deserve clarity, not contradiction.

Final Thoughts

You do not have to marry young. But you should not delay the search unnecessarily.

Whether you marry at 27 or 37, success depends on:

• Readiness
• Communication
• Emotional stability
• Shared values
• Mutual respect

If you are under 30, use this decade wisely. If you are over 30, walk forward with confidence and purpose.

In a world moving at incredible speed, choosing marriage thoughtfully—not too early, not too late—may be one of the most meaningful decisions of your life.

Raj Shah,
Managing Editor,
Deshvidesh Media Group.

Dear Readers,

Recently, I had the honor of being invited as a special guest at the Palm Beach India Association’s Diwali Celebration—a beautiful evening filled with light, laughter, and community spirit. The organizers requested that I speak on a theme close to my heart: “Unity.” As I prepared my remarks, I realized that this message is not only relevant for a festive gathering but also deeply meaningful for us as Indian-Americans in today’s world. Therefore, I am taking the liberty to share my speech in this month’s editorial column—a reflection on how the light of Diwali can also become the light of unity for our community.

The Light of Unity: A Diwali Reflection for Indian-Americans

It fills my heart with joy to see our community gather in celebration—families, friends, and well-wishers united under the glow of the diyas. The fragrance of sweets, the sparkle in every eye, and the warmth of togetherness remind us that Diwali is not merely a festival of light. It is a festival of hope, renewal, and the triumph of goodness over despair.

But this Diwali, I wish to speak about one light that must never fade—the light of unity.

The Promise of Our Community

As Hindu-Americans and Indian-Americans, we have achieved extraordinary success in this wonderful land of opportunity. We are among the most educated, accomplished, and respected immigrant groups in the United States. From medicine to technology and academia to entrepreneurship, our contributions enrich America every single day.

Individually, we shine brilliantly. Yet, when we look at ourselves as a community, we often fall short of the potential our collective strength could achieve. Our individual lights are strong—but together, they could form a powerful, unstoppable flame.

This truth became painfully evident recently when Kash Patel, a proud Indian-American, shared a simple Diwali greeting online. What followed was ridicule and negativity. More disappointing than the hate itself was our collective silence. We did not rise to his defense.

When one of us is insulted, it is not his problem—it is our problem.
When we stay silent, others define who we are.
When we stand together, we define who we are.

India’s Brand Ambassadors Abroad

During his visit to the United States, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke words that should echo in our hearts:

“You are India’s strong brand ambassadors abroad. Wherever you go, you carry not just your success but our culture, our values, and our unity. In your shared heritage and shared purpose lies our greatest strength.”

How true that is. We, the Indian-American community, represent the essence of India’s civilization—its diversity, tolerance, and pursuit of excellence.

Look around any Indian gathering in America. You will see people from every corner of India: Gujarat, Punjab, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Bengal, Maharashtra, and beyond. We speak different languages and follow unique traditions, yet share one deep bond—our Indian identity and our American spirit.

Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Our ability to reach unity in diversity will be the beauty and the test of our civilization.” That test, I believe, is before us now—right here in America.

A Story of Courage and Representation

If we seek proof of what unity can achieve, we need only look at Pia Dandiya—the first Indian-American woman to run for the U.S. Congress from Florida’s West Palm Beach district.

Her journey—from being raised by hardworking Indian immigrant parents to becoming an educator, school founder, White House Fellow, and now a congressional candidate—is a story of grit, service, and vision. Pia represents the very best of our community: excellence built on values, success rooted in purpose.

But her campaign is not just about her; it is about us—about visibility, representation, and pride. Her courage should awaken in us the realization that our voices matter, our participation matters, and our unity matters.

If we stand behind her, we will be part of history in the making. But history doesn’t happen by accident—it happens when people act.

Every Indian who is a U.S. citizen must register to vote.
And every Indian who is registered must vote.

We know politicians pay attention to two things—money and votes. We already contribute generously to the economy; now we must contribute powerfully at the ballot box. When we vote, we shape the future not only of this country but also of our children and community.

Our presence should be felt not just in temples and cultural centers, but in city halls, school boards, and Congress itself.

A Real Example of Unity: Diwali in Broward Schools

Unity is not an abstract idea—it becomes real when we act together. A shining example of this was witnessed recently in South Florida.

This year, as a member of the Broward County School Board Advisory Committee, I had the privilege—along with other dedicated community leaders—to help pass a historic resolution recognizing Diwali as an official school holiday.

For the first time ever, just last Monday, children in Broward County public schools celebrated Diwali as a day of joy and reflection. It was a proud moment not just for Hindus, but for every Indian-American who believes in cultural recognition and mutual respect.

This achievement did not come overnight. It was the result of months of advocacy, collaboration, and persistence—proof that when we come together with shared purpose, we can move mountains.

I now encourage our brothers and sisters in Palm Beach County to take up this mission—to work with their school boards so that students there, too, can celebrate Diwali as a school holiday.

And if you decide to take on this effort, please know that I am always here—ready to help, guide, and support you every step of the way.

Let this light of cultural recognition continue to spread across Florida—from Broward to Palm Beach, from Miami to Jacksonville—until Diwali shines in every school calendar across our state.

The Deeper Message of Diwali

At its heart, Diwali is not about one lamp, but about many. Darkness is not removed by a single flame, but by the collective brilliance of thousands of diyas.

One lamp can flicker—but a thousand together can illuminate the night sky.

That is the deeper message of Diwali: collective light. It teaches us that the smallest spark of kindness, when joined with others, becomes a force of transformation.

So, as we celebrate this festival, let us become those thousand lamps—united in purpose, compassion, and pride. Let us stand with one another in times of challenge and celebrate one another in times of joy. Let us teach our children that unity is not just a noble idea—it is a living responsibility.

Because the next generation is watching. When they see us divided, they inherit disunity. When they see us united, they inherit strength.

A Living Bridge Between Two Great Democracies

We must remember that we are not just Indian-Americans. We are a living bridge between two great democracies—India and the United States.

Our values of family, faith, and education mirror the American ideals of freedom, opportunity, and hard work. When we act together—in our temples, our neighborhoods, and our civic life—we become a force for good in both nations.

Indian-Americans are already contributing enormously to America’s success. We lead in innovation, medicine, and entrepreneurship. But our next chapter must be one of civic power—participation, representation, and unity.

When we come together—whether to support a local candidate, advocate for cultural inclusion, or help the needy—we honor not only our heritage but also our duty as citizens.

The Light Ahead

As we celebrate Diwali—the triumph of light over darkness—let us also celebrate the triumph of unity over division, participation over silence, and action over apathy.

Let the light that shines in our homes also shine in our hearts—guiding us toward greater harmony, compassion, and community pride.

May this Diwali inspire us to see not what separates us, but what binds us together. May it strengthen our role as citizens of two great nations, as torchbearers of dharma, and as ambassadors of peace.

And may the flame of unity we light tonight continue to burn brightly—not just for one night, but for generations to come.

Jai Hind. Jai Bharat. And Happy Diwali to all!

Happy Diwali to you and your family. May light always guide your path, and may truth always be your strength.

Raj Shah
Managing Editor

Dear Readers,

Every autumn, as leaves turn golden in America, I discover myself transported back to my childhood in India. The festival of Diwali has always been more than lights and sweets—it is the heartbeat of our culture, a declaration that virtue will always triumph over evil, truth over falsehood, and light over darkness.

Even though I have lived in the U.S. for decades, Diwali here feels no less powerful. I watch our Indian-American families fill temples and community halls, children in colorful kurtas lighting sparklers, neighbors tasting mithai for the first time, and elders explaining the story of Lord Rama’s return to Ayodhya. And every year I realize: Diwali in America is not just nostalgia—it is our way of declaring who we are, what we stand for, and why truth always wins.

Diwali in America: A Bridge of Light

Celebrating Diwali in the U.S. is more than carrying forward tradition—it is also about sharing our values with America. When our children explain the story of Rama and Sita to their classmates, or when city mayors light diyas at our community events, they are not just witnessing another culture’s holiday. They are hearing a universal truth: darkness does not win.

In a nation struggling with divisions, Diwali offers a message of unity. It reminds us that no matter our differences, light connects us all. As Indian-Americans, we have a responsibility to showcase Diwali not just as a cultural celebration but as a guiding principle: stand for truth, fight for what is right, and never lose faith in justice.

Diwali and the Eternal Triumph of Truth

At its core, Diwali is a reminder that no matter how strong falsehood appears, it cannot withstand the power of truth. Lord Rama’s return after defeating Ravana is not a story frozen in mythology; it is a living lesson for our times.

Recently, this truth has been tested in global politics. Under President Trump, India faced direct challenges. His administration imposed crushing tariffs on Indian goods—some as high as 50%—penalizing India while giving easier treatment to other nations. To make matters worse, he invited a senior Pakistani military leader to Washington, a move that rattled not only Indian-Americans but all Indians living all over the world and PM Modi’s administration. For those of us who have spent decades explaining to our American friends that India is a democratic ally while Pakistan has too often fueled instability and terrorism, the gesture was a bitter pill.

But Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not flinch. With calm determination, he stood firm. Modi refused to bend to threats, knowing that India’s strength—economic, strategic, and moral—was too great to be dismissed. His resolve forced the Trump administration to rethink. Eventually, the bluster gave way to reality, and Trump made a U-turn, returning to the negotiating table.

The negotiation was not just about trade. It was a modern reminder of Diwali’s central message: truth, patience, and courage will always outlast arrogance, intimidation, and short-term politics. India’s dignity was not only preserved—it was elevated.

The U.S.–India Relationship: A Partnership Tested

As an Indian-American, I believe strongly that the U.S. and India must be partners, not rivals. Both are great democracies, both believe in innovation, and are vital to global stability. However, American leaders frequently misunderstand India, sometimes viewing it as a rival and at other times equating it with Pakistan, which lacks both India’s stability and its democratic values.

The Trump years tested this relationship severely. But they also showed something important: India will not be bullied. India’s leadership stood strong, proving that it seeks partnerships built on mutual respect, not submission. And America, whether under Trump or any future president, will eventually recognize that India is not a country to be managed—it is a country to be embraced.

As we look forward, Diwali’s message should guide this partnership. If both nations commit to truth, fairness, and respect, their alliance can light the path for the entire world.

India’s Pride: The Asia Cup Victory

This Diwali season also brought another moment of pride: India lifting the Asia Cup for a record ninth time. The final against Pakistan was filled with tension. Pakistan’s batting collapsed under the pressure of India’s disciplined bowling, and when India stumbled early in its chase, nerves ran high. But then came the calm brilliance of Tilak Varma, whose unbeaten 69 anchored the innings. With Suryakumar Yadav by his side, India successfully completed the match, securing victory with five wickets remaining.

I watched the match with friends in Florida, and our cheers echoed through the walls. For a brief moment, the gap between America and Dubai vanished, uniting us in joy, pride, and belief.

This was not just a cricket win. It was a statement of resilience, teamwork, and determination—qualities that define India itself. Prime Minister Modi perfectly encapsulated the team’s victory, stating that it embodied India’s unwavering spirit. In many ways, the Asia Cup final was another Diwali lesson: challenges will come, doubts will arise, but with courage and discipline, victory is inevitable.

A Personal Reflection

When I light a diya this year in my Florida home, I will think of my parents in India who taught me that truth is the only path worth walking. I will think of my children and grandchildren, who carry this festival forward with joy and pride. And I will think of all of you—our Desh-Videsh family—who keep our culture alive in the U.S., making Diwali not just a Hindu festival but a global message of hope.

This Diwali, let us remember: darkness may roar, but it cannot endure. Whether in trade disputes, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, or in a cricket stadium in Dubai, the law of dharma holds true. Goodness, courage, and determination will always prevail.

So let us celebrate boldly. Let us teach our children that Diwali is not just about firecrackers and sweets—it is about truth, resilience, and victory. And let us stand together, as Indians, as Americans, and as global citizens, to keep this flame burning brightly.

Happy Diwali to you and your family. May light always guide your path, and may truth always be your strength.

Raj Shah

Managing Editor

Dear Readers, and especially Newly Engaged Couples,

Whenever I attend a Hindu wedding here in the United States, I find myself smiling—not necessarily because of the union of the two souls, but because of what I see taking place around the mandap. The laughter of young cousins, the guidance of elders, the recitation of mantras in Sanskrit resonating within a Florida banquet hall or a California vineyard—it’s all reminiscent of the weddings I used to attend growing up in India. And yet there is one more aspect. At times, I have the sense that our weddings here in America are even closer to tradition than most of the weddings in India.

It may sound surprising, but let me explain why I believe these facts and a few experiences that have stayed with me.

Rediscovering Our Roots

When I first came to this country in the 1970s, I did not hear too many Hindu weddings taking place. We didn’t have many temples, Pandits, or even a sufficient number of extended family members nearby to do everything the traditional way. Sometimes ceremonies were shortened, or some steps skipped, just to make things easier.

Fast forward to the present—what a change! Now that I attend a Hindu wedding, I find pandits explaining each of the rituals in English so that the next generation and even the non-Hindu visitors are aware. I see families making sure all the customs—from Kanyādān to Saat Phere—are done exactly the way our ancestors had envisioned. I see grooms and brides reading the meaning of the Saptapadi vows.

I remember attending one wedding in Atlanta in which the bride and groom, both U.S.-born Hindus, had asked their pandit to slowly explain the ceremony, explaining each mantra as it was recited. They did not merely want to perform the rituals but understand them. Seated there, I thought, “This is how tradition endures—when our children ask not only how, but why.”

Why do we hold on tighter here?

Weddings are commonplace in India—every season, every town, every village. Given the sheer number of weddings in India, it’s unsurprising that these rituals often become shortened or modified, transforming into mere routines. But here in the U.S., a Hindu wedding is a special occasion, a chance to rejoin our heritage in the most public of ways.

It is not just about the couple for most families but also about bringing the next generation into who we are. Our children may grow up speaking more English than Gujarati, Hindi, or Tamil, but when they sit beneath that mandap, they are learning with their hearts.

I had been to a wedding in Orlando a few years ago, where the groom, who had never visited India, suddenly turned into emotion personified during the Saat Phere. He explained to me afterward, “Uncle, I felt for the first time connected to something greater than myself.” That is the power of such rituals—they awaken something in us, even if on the other side of the ocean.

The Beautiful Surprise: Non-Hindus Joining With Full Devotion

What I find more surprising is seeing non-Hindus—Americans, Christians, or Jews—marry into our Hindu community and perform these rituals with so much passion.

I remember a wedding in Miami that I still ponder. The bride was Hindu, the groom Christian. As the Pandit initiated the fire ceremony, the groom sincerely chanted each mantra, giving the impression that he had grown up hearing them. Later, he told me that he had worked on Sanskrit sounds for weeks, not because anybody asked him to, but because he wanted to honor his bride’s heritage. His parents, who came from New York, said, “We felt blessed to be part of this.”

And occasionally it is the non-Hindu spouse who demands “doing everything right.” In Tampa, I encountered a non-Hindu bride who demanded to be dressed in a traditional red lehenga, to the surprise of her Hindu in-laws, who said she could put on anything. She smiled and said, “I want to respect the culture that I’m marrying into. It means a lot to me.”

Instances such as these remind me that our traditions are not exclusively our own to defend—they are gifts that others also want to adopt.

Fusion, Yes—but Never at the Cost of Tradition

Of course, we are in America, and we see wonderful blends. The baraat may have a dhol player and the DJ may be spinning hip-hop. The bride may wear for the ceremony a red sari and for the reception a white gown. A mehndi night might have on it Bollywood music blended with salsa dancing.

I observed a groom arriving at his wedding in Dallas aboard a white horse, donning a cowboy hat perched atop his turban! Everyone was in hysterics, but no one ever forgot that when it was time for ritual, fire was lit, mantras were recited, and vows exchanged with utter sincerity. That’s the brilliance of our community—we integrate but do not abandon.

Parents, Elders, and the Mandap serve as teachers.

And then there are parents and grandparents. They have a tendency to be the guardians of tradition, and everything is done as a ritual, every mantra recited, and every god worshiped.

I remember a gray-haired grandmother from New Jersey leaning forward to me at her grandson’s wedding and whispering, “Every ritual being performed. Just like in my marriage in Gujarat.” Her eyes sparkled with joy. It is because of that joy that we hold on so tight—it is about tradition, about keeping our elderly in place and our children rooted.

And thanks to the Pandits here who take the time to explain everything in English, the mandap has become a classroom. I’ve seen children who usually fidget through pujas suddenly listen with wide eyes when they hear that the seven steps are promises to share food, respect, and friendship for life.

Weddings as Community Celebrations

Another thing I notice about wedding traditions being different here is the way weddings become more of community affairs. Here we not only invite our close friends and relatives, but we also invite temple friends, Bal Vihar friends, professional colleagues, and even neighbors.

At one wedding in Coral Springs, I watched as half of the volunteers helping with decorations were not relatives but friends from the community. That seva ethos, that volunteering for other people’s happiness, is one of the reasons Hindu weddings in America are just breathtaking.

A Tradition Made Stronger Abroad

So here’s the truth: Hindu weddings in America are not just holding their own—they’re thriving. Many of them are actually more elaborate, more genuine, and more sincere than they are in India today.

Every time I see a young couple complete the Saat Phere, I know I am safe. Our culture is not only surviving because we hold on to it, but also because we embody it. And when non-Hindus join in and adore these customs, it shows something compelling: Hindu values are not geographically, linguistically, or even religiously bound. They are about love, dedication, family, and the holiness of life itself.

My Last Reflection

As I sit to write this for our wedding issue of Desh-Videsh Magazine, I think about all the weddings that I have attended here in America. Each one leaves me more convinced that our traditions are not fading with distance—they are blooming. They are being relearned, reinterpreted, and celebrated in earnest.

When two people walk around the sacred fire here in America, they’re not merely beginning a new life together—they’re carrying on thousands of years of knowledge. And when people of all faiths and cultures take part in these ceremonies, they remind us that love and dharma are not Hindu principles whatsoever—simply human principles.

And that, to me, is truly worth celebrating!

Raj Shah

Managing Editor

Dear Readers,

Why I’m Losing Faith in Trump

As someone who voted for Donald Trump three times, I believed I was supporting a bold leader who would put America first, shake up the status quo, and bring long-overdue clarity and strength to U.S. foreign policy. I appreciated his tough stance on China, his willingness to confront global hypocrisy, and his pro-business, pro-America rhetoric. But what we are witnessing now is a troubling evolution—a pattern of erratic, short-term decisions driven more by personal ego and impulse than by long-term national interest.

Despite my initial support for Trump, I have the honesty and conviction to point out his mistakes. That is more than I can say for some of my friends who harbor such strong animosity towards Trump that they are unable to recognize any of his accomplishments. They won’t acknowledge his successes with the economy or the Abraham Accords, just as they blindly overlook how President Biden and then-candidate Kamala Harris hurt our country with divisive rhetoric, inconsistent energy policy, and weak international leadership.

Let’s return to Trump. Let’s talk about where things are going seriously off track—and how that is relevant for the future of U.S. credibility and prosperity.

The India Dilemma: Tariffs and Oil Hypocrisy

One of the most baffling recent developments is Trump’s newly proposed 25% tariff on Indian imports, combined with threats of economic penalties if India continues to buy oil from Russia. This is astonishing—not only because India is one of America’s most important strategic partners in the Indo-Pacific, but also because it reveals a profound misunderstanding of India’s national interests.

India’s Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, has made it clear that India will purchase energy from any source that offers the best deal. That includes discounted Russian oil. And Modi has not backed down under pressure—neither from the Biden administration nor from Trump’s recent remarks. Such behavior isn’t anti-Americanism. It’s simply smart policy. Like any world leader, Modi is doing what’s best for his people, especially during a time of inflation and energy volatility.

Trump’s strategy, which employs tariffs and economic threats as blunt tools of foreign policy, may garner immediate attention, but it undermines enduring alliances. America should not bully India, nor should she punish it. It’s the world’s largest democracy, a rising economic power, and a natural counterweight to China. Alienating India is not just poor diplomacy—it’s strategically foolish.

And the irony doesn’t stop there. While threatening India over Russian oil, Trump recently made a bizarre announcement about wanting to drill for oil in Pakistan, a country that has little proven oil reserves and is not even a realistic candidate for such an operation. It’s unclear whether the statement was a misunderstanding, a publicity stunt, or just another example of Trump speaking without facts—but it left both diplomats and energy experts scratching their heads.

Pakistan: From Critic to Cheerleader

This is the same Trump who once criticized Pakistan for harboring terrorists and demanded accountability. He even praised Imran Khan, the former prime minister of Pakistan, and called for his release when he was jailed by the military regime. But today, he appears to be cozying up to the very Pakistani generals who orchestrated Khan’s imprisonment—specifically General Asim Munir.

General Munir, known as the force behind Khan’s ouster and suppression of democratic voices, is now being treated with diplomatic favor. Even General Michael Kurilla, head of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), recently called Pakistan a “phenomenal partner in the counter-terrorism world,” even though terrorists continue to be discovered within its borders.

What happened to principles? What happened to standing with democratic leaders and opposing military regimes? This about-face is not strategy—it’s inconsistency that weakens U.S. credibility abroad.

Trump vs. Elon Musk: A Fight That Helps No One

Then there’s the self-inflicted feud with Elon Musk. What began as a policy disagreement—Musk questioning the tax implications of Trump’s proposals—devolved into a personal insult contest. Trump attacked Musk’s business acumen, questioned his loyalty, and mocked him on social media.

Let’s be honest: Elon Musk, for all his eccentricities, is one of the most important innovators of our time. He’s building the future of transportation, space travel, and artificial intelligence. Picking a fight with him just because he voiced criticism is not a sign of leadership, but rather of ego-driven immaturity. And it sends the wrong message to every entrepreneur and visionary who might otherwise align with conservative economic values.

Israel and Ukraine: Love-Hate, Hot-Cold Diplomacy

Trump’s tense relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu raises additional concerns. As president, Trump was one of the most pro-Israel leaders in American history—moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, recognizing the Golan Heights, and brokering the historic Abraham Accords. These were landmark moves.

Yet after Netanyahu congratulated Joe Biden on his 2020 win, Trump’s tone shifted dramatically. He lashed out at Netanyahu in interviews, calling him disloyal and using profane language. Why? Netanyahu failed to put Trump’s personal emotions ahead of diplomatic etiquette. That kind of response is not leadership—it’s emotional politics.

Similarly, Trump’s stance on Ukraine has been murky and inconsistent. While he once tried to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for political favors, more recently he has criticized U.S. aid to Ukraine altogether, claiming the war is “not our fight.”

Let’s be clear: supporting Ukraine is not about endless foreign wars. It’s about deterring authoritarian expansion, maintaining the global order, and showing our allies that we stand by them. Abandoning Ukraine, or using it as a pawn in political games, is shortsighted and emboldens aggressors like Putin.

Tariffs as a Foreign Policy Tool: Short-Term Win, Long-Term Loss

Trump is increasingly relying on tariffs as a default foreign policy tool—not just on India, but on China, Europe, and beyond. This may generate short-term pressure, but most economists and geopolitical experts agree: it creates instability, drives up costs for American consumers, and often fails to achieve the desired political outcomes.

As multiple foreign policy experts and economists (yes, even conservative ones) have said, tariffs are not a substitute for diplomacy. Tariffs ought to serve as a supplementary tool, not a primary weapon. And when used indiscriminately, they damage relationships that took decades to build.

Honesty Over Loyalty

As a Trump voter, I still believe he had some great policies. He shook the global establishment, he was fearless on immigration and trade, and he brought attention to issues the media tried to ignore. But I’m also willing to call him out when he’s wrong. That’s called honesty. That’s called being a bigger man.

Too many people today treat politics like a sport. If you’re on Team Trump, he can do no wrong. If you align yourself with Team Biden, you believe that Trump embodies pure evil. I decline to engage in such discourse. I have friends who hate Trump so much they won’t admit he had any beneficial ideas. And those same people blindly supported Kamala Harris and Joe Biden, ignoring their countless missteps.

But America doesn’t need more blind loyalty. It needs clarity, courage, and consistency.

America Deserves Better

I voted for Trump because I believed in the promise of a strong, sovereign, America-first future. But what I see now is a man whose decisions are increasingly erratic, short-term, and self-serving. His shifting stances on Pakistan, India, Israel, Ukraine, and his fights with private citizens like Elon Musk show a leader more concerned with ego than enduring principle.

America deserves better than emotional foreign policy. We need vision, discipline, and partners who trust our word. And that starts with holding all our leaders—past, present, and future—accountable.

Raj Shah
Managing Editor